Thomas Barz
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Papers in
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 23
- Pharmacology 17
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 17
- Co-authors
- Markus Melloh (26 shared papers)Jean‐Claude Theis (13 shared papers)Lukas Staub (13 shared papers)H. Merk (10 shared papers)Achim Elfering (10 shared papers)Christoph Röder (10 shared papers)Cornelia Rolli Salathé (6 shared papers)Dietmar Spengler (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- European Spine Journal (5 papers)BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (3 papers)Spine (3 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)The Spine Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Thomas Barz
38 papers receiving 785 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Pharmacology 466
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 382
- Medical Laboratory Technology 17
- Occupational Therapy 45
- Psychiatry and Mental health 86
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Barz
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Barz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Barz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Barz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Barz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Barz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Barz. The network helps show where Thomas Barz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Barz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 106 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 59 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 49 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 45 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 30 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 26 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 26 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 25 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 24 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 24 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 14 |
About Thomas Barz
Thomas Barz is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 38 papers that have together received 805 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (23 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (17 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (6 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (4 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (4 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (3 papers) and Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (466 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (382 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (17 citations), Occupational Therapy (45 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (86 citations). Thomas Barz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Markus Melloh, Jean‐Claude Theis, Lukas Staub, H. Merk, Achim Elfering, Christoph Röder, Cornelia Rolli Salathé, Dietmar Spengler, Sarah J. Lord and Anke Hoffmann. Their work appears in journals such as European Spine Journal, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Spine, PLoS ONE and The Spine Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.