Arthur Ameis
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Surgery
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Cell Biology
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Co-authors
- Jessica J. WongAnne Taylor‐VaiseyHainan YuPierre CôtéHeather M. ShearerDanielle SoutherstLinda CarrollSharanya Varatharajan
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers)Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (4 papers)Shoulder Injury and Treatment (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Arthur Ameis
14 papers receiving 619 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Pharmacology 387
- Surgery 192
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 188
- Cell Biology 89
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 85
Countries citing papers authored by Arthur Ameis
This map shows the geographic impact of Arthur Ameis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arthur Ameis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arthur Ameis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Arthur Ameis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arthur Ameis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arthur Ameis. The network helps show where Arthur Ameis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Arthur Ameis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Arthur Ameis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Arthur Ameis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Arthur Ameis. Arthur Ameis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | |
| 2 | Clinical practice guidelines for the noninvasive management of low back pain: A systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaborationbreakdown → | 279 |
| 3 | 69 | |
| 4 | 41 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 38 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | Carpal tunnel syndrome: objective measures and splint use. | 76 |
| 12 | Cervical whiplash: considerations in the rehabilitation of cervical myofascial injury. | 5 |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | M components-a review of 1242 cases. | 53 |
About Arthur Ameis
Arthur Ameis is a scholar working on Medical Laboratory Technology, Pharmacology and Occupational Therapy, having authored 14 papers that have together received 661 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (4 papers) and Shoulder Injury and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (387 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (188 citations) and Occupational Therapy (35 citations). Arthur Ameis has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jessica J. Wong, Anne Taylor‐Vaisey, Hainan Yu, Pierre Côté, Heather M. Shearer, Danielle Southerst, Linda Carroll, Sharanya Varatharajan, Kristi Randhawa and Silvano Mior. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy and European Spine Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.