Thomas A. Hughes
- Co-authors
- John T. GwynneCharles A. HerbstGilbert WhiteBoyd R. SwitzerMelissa B. RileyEllis L. KlineS. S. HayasakaPeter J. Neame
- Topics
- Diet and metabolism studies (2 papers)Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (2 papers)Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Thomas A. Hughes
12 papers receiving 342 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 136
- Surgery 105
- Physiology 103
- Molecular Biology 81
- Pharmacology 52
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas A. Hughes
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas A. Hughes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas A. Hughes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas A. Hughes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas A. Hughes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas A. Hughes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas A. Hughes. The network helps show where Thomas A. Hughes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas A. Hughes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas A. Hughes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas A. Hughes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas A. Hughes. Thomas A. Hughes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 51 | |
| 3 | In Vitro Antibiotic Sensitivity and Resistance of 100 Clinical Bacterial Isolates Purified from Microbial Biofilms Associated with Silicone GastrostomyTubes Removed from Pediatric Patients | 2 |
| 4 | Accelerated bioremediation of chlorinated solvents in a fractured rock aquifer. | 1 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | Use of glucose disappearance rates (kG) to monitor endocrine function of pancreas allografts. | 18 |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 158 |
About Thomas A. Hughes
Thomas A. Hughes is a scholar working on Transplantation, Pharmacy and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diet and metabolism studies (2 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (2 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (136 citations), Transplantation (13 citations) and Physiology (103 citations). Thomas A. Hughes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include John T. Gwynne, Charles A. Herbst, Gilbert White, Boyd R. Switzer, Melissa B. Riley, Ellis L. Kline, S. S. Hayasaka, Peter J. Neame, B H Chung and Mark J. Rumbak. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Medicine, Journal of Lipid Research and Atherosclerosis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.