Theophilus Teo

33 total papers · 588 total citations
24 papers, 441 citations indexed

About

Theophilus Teo is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Theophilus Teo has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 441 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 15 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Theophilus Teo's work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (20 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (13 papers) and Interactive and Immersive Displays (10 papers). Theophilus Teo is often cited by papers focused on Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (20 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (13 papers) and Interactive and Immersive Displays (10 papers). Theophilus Teo collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Japan and Taiwan. Theophilus Teo's co-authors include Mark Billinghurst, Gun Lee, Matt Adcock, Seungwon Kim, Zhengqing Li, Liwei Chan, Maki Sugimoto, Hideki Koike, Bruce H. Thomas and Adrien Verhulst and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces and UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia).

In The Last Decade

Theophilus Teo

22 papers receiving 438 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Theophilus Teo 388 340 82 42 26 24 441
Lei Gao 239 0.6× 206 0.6× 107 1.3× 37 0.9× 20 0.8× 38 450
Carmine Elvezio 318 0.8× 321 0.9× 46 0.6× 65 1.5× 39 1.5× 30 446
Tim Weißker 330 0.9× 174 0.5× 47 0.6× 66 1.6× 40 1.5× 27 428
Evgeny Stemasov 376 1.0× 228 0.7× 37 0.5× 79 1.9× 12 0.5× 15 432
Andrew Irlitti 345 0.9× 333 1.0× 37 0.5× 43 1.0× 57 2.2× 21 446
Ohan Oda 324 0.8× 336 1.0× 38 0.5× 40 1.0× 31 1.2× 15 392
Hongwei Yang 218 0.6× 193 0.6× 27 0.3× 28 0.7× 35 1.3× 15 486
Shuxia Wang 284 0.7× 310 0.9× 89 1.1× 45 1.1× 15 0.6× 58 447
Nobuchika Sakata 275 0.7× 219 0.6× 41 0.5× 80 1.9× 14 0.5× 56 386
Ke Huo 298 0.8× 235 0.7× 56 0.7× 142 3.4× 26 1.0× 28 474

Countries citing papers authored by Theophilus Teo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Theophilus Teo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theophilus Teo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theophilus Teo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Theophilus Teo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Theophilus Teo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Theophilus Teo. The network helps show where Theophilus Teo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Theophilus Teo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Theophilus Teo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Theophilus Teo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Theophilus Teo. Theophilus Teo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026