Theda Rose

764 citations
30 papers · 445 · h-index 12

Impact in

    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
    • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health top 10%
    • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Papers in

Theda Rose

28 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

Theda Rose
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Clinical Psychology 243
  • Health 83
  • Social Psychology 151
  • Safety Research 55
  • Applied Psychology 29
Replace Lara Ayala‐Nunes with:
Lara Ayala‐Nunes Portugal
Thomson J. Ling United States
Kathryne B. Brewer United States
Yasmin Cole-Lewis United States
Iwalani R. N. Else United States
Mária Bačíková-Slešková Slovakia
Christina Han Canada
Thomas W. Pavkov United States
Leslie B. Whitbeck United States
C. André Christie‐Mizell United States
Theda Rose relative to Lara Ayala‐Nunes Portugal Lara Ayala‐Nunes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Lara Ayala‐Nunes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Theda Rose

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Theda Rose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theda Rose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theda Rose more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Theda Rose

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Theda Rose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Theda Rose. The network helps show where Theda Rose may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Theda Rose, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Theda Rose Line = papers co-authored together Theda Rose links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201766
2 201747
3 201942
4 201342
5 201034
6 201730
7 201627
8 201621
9 201519
10 202014
11 201612
12 201411
13 20229
14 20179
15 20198
16 20228
17 20217
18 20186
19 20206
20 20225

About Theda Rose

Theda Rose is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Education and Safety Research, having authored 30 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (10 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (7 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (6 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (6 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (5 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (4 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (4 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (243 citations), Health (83 citations), Social Psychology (151 citations), Safety Research (55 citations) and Applied Psychology (29 citations). Theda Rose has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Sean Joe, Michael A. Lindsey, Sharon F. Lambert, Nadine Finigan‐Carr, Joseph J. Shields, Cleopatra H. Caldwell, Ryan Harris, Sarah Stewart‐Brown, Corey S. Shdaimah and Yunyu Xiao. Their work appears in journals such as Children and Youth Services Review, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Journal of Research on Adolescence, Journal of Community Psychology and Child & Youth Care Forum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact