Tetsuya Nagata
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Neurology top 1%
- Genetics top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Neurology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Serge PrzedborskiHynek WichterleDiane B. RéMakiko NagaiAlcmène ChalazonitisThomas M. JessellYoshitsugu AokiShin’ichi Takeda
- Topics
- RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (30 papers)Muscle Physiology and Disorders (22 papers)DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Tetsuya Nagata
103 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Molecular Biology 2.3k
- Neurology 1.1k
- Genetics 836
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 716
- Neurology 517
Countries citing papers authored by Tetsuya Nagata
This map shows the geographic impact of Tetsuya Nagata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tetsuya Nagata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tetsuya Nagata more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tetsuya Nagata
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tetsuya Nagata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tetsuya Nagata. The network helps show where Tetsuya Nagata may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tetsuya Nagata
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tetsuya Nagata. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tetsuya Nagata based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tetsuya Nagata. Tetsuya Nagata is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 36 | |
| 14 | 56 | |
| 15 | Improvement of screening for protective substances against zinc-induced neuronal cell death | 2 |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | Protective Activity of the Extracts from Japanese eel (Anguilla japonica) Against Zinc-induced Neuronal Cell Death: Carnosine and an Unknown Substance | 10 |
| 19 | 62 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Tetsuya Nagata
Tetsuya Nagata is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Neurology, having authored 107 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (30 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (22 papers) and DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (836 citations), Neurology (1.1k citations) and Neurology (517 citations). Tetsuya Nagata has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Serge Przedborski, Hynek Wichterle, Diane B. Ré, Makiko Nagai, Alcmène Chalazonitis, Thomas M. Jessell, Yoshitsugu Aoki, Shin’ichi Takeda, Takashi Saito and Akinori Nakamura. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nucleic Acids Research and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.