Tessa Crilly

400 total citations
9 papers, 244 citations indexed

About

Tessa Crilly is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, General Health Professions and Health Information Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Tessa Crilly has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 244 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Strategy and Management, 3 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Health Information Management. Recurrent topics in Tessa Crilly's work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers). Tessa Crilly is often cited by papers focused on Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers). Tessa Crilly collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Tessa Crilly's co-authors include Ashok Jashapara, Ewan Ferlı́e, Graeme Currie, John Crilly, Charles Wolfe, Anthony Threlfall, Thomas Round, Sebastian Hinde, Philip Crosbie and Janet Tonge and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Science & Medicine and Lung Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Tessa Crilly

8 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Tessa Crilly United Kingdom	8	138	34	30	29	27	9	244
Antonello Zangrandi Italy	10	55 0.4×	21 0.6×	36 1.2×	37 1.3×	12 0.4×	30	232
Jean Ledger United Kingdom	10	90 0.7×	84 2.5×	34 1.1×	35 1.2×	3 0.1×	24	271
Louise‐Hélène Trottier Canada	3	190 1.4×	50 1.5×	69 2.3×	21 0.7×	6 0.2×	5	333
Viera Wardhani Indonesia	7	122 0.9×	33 1.0×	26 0.9×	47 1.6×	5 0.2×	32	283
Phillip Kim United States	6	292 2.1×	37 1.1×	7 0.2×	5 0.2×	55 2.0×	9	492
Sandra Collins United States	10	78 0.6×	66 1.9×	28 0.9×	18 0.6×	2 0.1×	47	285
Céline Bareil Canada	9	94 0.7×	62 1.8×	15 0.5×	27 0.9×	2 0.1×	20	289
J. Adam Holbrook Canada	8	62 0.4×	18 0.5×	97 3.2×	86 3.0×	8 0.3×	51	436
Arturo Álvarez-Rosete United Kingdom	8	86 0.6×	14 0.4×	49 1.6×	6 0.2×	33 1.2×	18	198
Miriam Marcus‐Smith United States	9	214 1.6×	25 0.7×	184 6.1×	11 0.4×	17 0.6×	14	352

Countries citing papers authored by Tessa Crilly

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tessa Crilly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tessa Crilly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tessa Crilly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tessa Crilly

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tessa Crilly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tessa Crilly. The network helps show where Tessa Crilly may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tessa Crilly

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tessa Crilly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tessa Crilly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tessa Crilly. Tessa Crilly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Davidson, Deborah, Angela Ellis Paine, Jon Glasby, et al.. (2019). Analysis of the profile, characteristics, patient experience and community value of community hospitals: a multimethod study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(1). 1–152. 22 indexed citations

Hinde, Sebastian, Tessa Crilly, Haval Balata, et al.. (2018). The cost-effectiveness of the Manchester ‘lung health checks’, a community-based lung cancer low-dose CT screening pilot. Lung Cancer. 126. 119–124. 27 indexed citations

Round, Thomas, Mark Ashworth, Tessa Crilly, Ewan Ferlı́e, & Charles Wolfe. (2018). An integrated care programme in London: qualitative evaluation. Journal of Integrated Care. 26(4). 296–308. 16 indexed citations

Ferlı́e, Ewan, et al.. (2015). Knowledge Mobilization in Healthcare Organizations: A View from the Resource-Based View of the Firm. Research Information System of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences (Ardabil University of Medical Sciences).

Ferlı́e, Ewan, et al.. (2015). Knowledge mobilization in healthcare organizations: a view from the resource-based view of the firm. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 4(3). 127–130. 14 indexed citations

Crilly, Tessa, et al.. (2013). Knowledge mobilisation in healthcare organisations: Synthesising evidence and theory using perspectives of organisational form, resource based view of the firm and critical theory. Research Portal (King's College London). 18 indexed citations

Ferlı́e, Ewan, et al.. (2012). Knowledge mobilisation in healthcare: A critical review of health sector and generic management literature. Social Science & Medicine. 74(8). 1297–1304. 104 indexed citations

Crilly, Tessa, et al.. (2010). Research Utilisation & Knowledge Mobilisation: A Scoping Review of the Literature. 32 indexed citations

Lusignan, Simon de, et al.. (2005). A knowledge audit of the managers of primary care organizations: top priority is how to use routinely collected clinical data for quality improvement. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine. 30(1). 69–80. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact