Tess Johnson
Impact in
-
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Papers in
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 4
- Zoonotic diseases and public health 2
-
- Ethics in medical practice 4
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices 2
- Co-authors
- Deborah L. McCartney (1 shared paper)Marion Rutherford (1 shared paper)Iain McClure (1 shared paper)Karen McKenzie (1 shared paper)Anne O’Hare (1 shared paper)Kirsty Forsyth (1 shared paper)Aja Louise Murray (1 shared paper)Sebastian Sauer (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Bioethics (4 papers)Public Health Ethics (2 papers)BMJ Global Health (2 papers)Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal (1 paper)Journal of Medical Ethics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesThailand
In The Last Decade
Tess Johnson
15 papers receiving 246 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 23
- Cognitive Neuroscience 144
- Clinical Psychology 74
- Education 60
- Psychiatry and Mental health 28
Countries citing papers authored by Tess Johnson
This map shows the geographic impact of Tess Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tess Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tess Johnson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tess Johnson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tess Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tess Johnson. The network helps show where Tess Johnson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tess Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 142 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 52 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2025 | 0 |
About Tess Johnson
Tess Johnson is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 20 papers that have together received 253 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (4 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Zoonotic diseases and public health (2 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (2 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (2 papers) and Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (23 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (144 citations), Clinical Psychology (74 citations), Education (60 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (28 citations). Tess Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Deborah L. McCartney, Marion Rutherford, Iain McClure, Karen McKenzie, Anne O’Hare, Kirsty Forsyth, Aja Louise Murray, Sebastian Sauer, Martin Loef and Phaik Yeong Cheah. Their work appears in journals such as Bioethics, Public Health Ethics, BMJ Global Health, Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal and Journal of Medical Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.