Terje Lensberg
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 2%
- Accounting top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Finance top 5%
- Co-authors
- Thomas E. McKeeWilliam ThomsonAasmund EilifsenKlaus Reiner Schenk–HoppéKen BinmoreThorsten HensJan PalczewskiVolker Böhm
- Topics
- Economic theories and models (9 papers)Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (7 papers)Game Theory and Voting Systems (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- NorwayUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Terje Lensberg
19 papers receiving 595 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Economics and Econometrics 344
- Management Science and Operations Research 227
- Accounting 221
- Artificial Intelligence 176
- Finance 115
Countries citing papers authored by Terje Lensberg
This map shows the geographic impact of Terje Lensberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Terje Lensberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Terje Lensberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Terje Lensberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Terje Lensberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Terje Lensberg. The network helps show where Terje Lensberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Terje Lensberg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Terje Lensberg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Terje Lensberg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Terje Lensberg. Terje Lensberg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 118 | |
| 12 | Social capital formation : some theory and experimental evidence | 0 |
| 13 | 170 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | The double monopoly has no Nash equilibrium | 0 |
| 16 | 61 | |
| 17 | 70 | |
| 18 | 85 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Terje Lensberg
Terje Lensberg is a scholar working on Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 22 papers that have together received 650 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (9 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (7 papers) and Game Theory and Voting Systems (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (221 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (227 citations) and General Decision Sciences (32 citations). Terje Lensberg has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Thomas E. McKee, William Thomson, Aasmund Eilifsen, Klaus Reiner Schenk–Hoppé, Ken Binmore, Thorsten Hens, Jan Palczewski, Volker Böhm and Eline van der Heijden. Their work appears in journals such as Econometrica, European Journal of Operational Research and Journal of Banking & Finance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.