This map shows the geographic impact of Tena B. Crews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tena B. Crews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tena B. Crews more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tena B. Crews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tena B. Crews. The network helps show where Tena B. Crews may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tena B. Crews
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tena B. Crews.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tena B. Crews based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tena B. Crews. Tena B. Crews is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Crews, Tena B., et al.. (2009). Preparing Student Teaching Interns: Advice from Current Business Educators.. Delta Pi Epsilon journal. 51(1). 43–55.8 indexed citations
Crews, Tena B., et al.. (2008). Workload Management Strategies for Online Educators. Delta Pi Epsilon journal. 50(3). 132–149.9 indexed citations
7.
Crews, Tena B., et al.. (2007). Student Campus Technology Trends: 2001 versus 2006.. The EDUCAUSE quarterly/EDUCAUSE quarterly. 30(4). 30–36.4 indexed citations
8.
Crews, Tena B.. (2007). How Professional Organizations Can Help Meet the Professional Development Needs of Middle School Business and Technology Educators.. Delta Pi Epsilon journal. 49(2). 140–146.1 indexed citations
Wilkinson, Kelly, et al.. (2006). Converting Assessment of Traditional Classroom Assignments to the e-Learning Environment. OpenSIUC (Southern Illinois University Carbondale). 2(2). 2.5 indexed citations
Wilkinson, Kelly, et al.. (2005). Synchronous Versus Asynchronous: Delivery of Online Instruction and the Factors that Lead to Success or Failure. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2005(1). 2253–2257.1 indexed citations
13.
Crews, Tena B.. (2004). Telecommunications Course Content: Input from Information Technology Professionals.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 15(4). 417–426.13 indexed citations
14.
Crews, Tena B.. (2002). Fundamentals of Insurance.1 indexed citations
15.
Crews, Tena B., et al.. (2000). Assessing the technology training needs of elementary school teachers. 8(2). 111–121.48 indexed citations
16.
Crews, Tena B., et al.. (2000). Comparison of Communication Skills Needed by Information Systems Undergraduates and Graduates as Perceived by Information Systems Professionals. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 11(3). 151–156.2 indexed citations
17.
Crews, Tena B., et al.. (1999). Most Common Grammatical and Punctuation Errors Made by Undergraduates as Perceived by Business Communication Professors.. Delta Pi Epsilon journal. 41(4).1 indexed citations
18.
Stitt-Gohdes, Wanda L., et al.. (1999). Business Teachers' Learning and Instructional Styles.. Delta Pi Epsilon journal. 41(2). 71–88.8 indexed citations
19.
Crews, Tena B., et al.. (1999). Utilizing the Evaluation Process in CD-ROM Development.. Delta Pi Epsilon journal. 41(1). 14–25.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.