Tena B. Crews

923 total citations
39 papers, 600 citations indexed

About

Tena B. Crews is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Tena B. Crews has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 600 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Education, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Tena B. Crews's work include Online and Blended Learning (9 papers), Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development (7 papers) and Conferences and Exhibitions Management (5 papers). Tena B. Crews is often cited by papers focused on Online and Blended Learning (9 papers), Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development (7 papers) and Conferences and Exhibitions Management (5 papers). Tena B. Crews collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Spain. Tena B. Crews's co-authors include Wanda L. Stitt-Gohdes, Sheryl F. Kline, Kelly Wilkinson, Robin B. DiPietro, Jeffrey M. Campbell, Daniela B. Friedman, John C. Besley, Juan M. Caicedo, Li Yin and Robert G. Brookshire and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Hospitality Management, Journal of the Association for Information Systems and Higher Education.

In The Last Decade

Tena B. Crews

36 papers receiving 508 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tena B. Crews United States 14 268 198 81 56 53 39 600
Meghan Grace United States 6 201 0.8× 189 1.0× 84 1.0× 60 1.1× 56 1.1× 8 666
María Vallespín Arán Spain 9 168 0.6× 164 0.8× 54 0.7× 39 0.7× 50 0.9× 19 468
Damian Maher Australia 14 362 1.4× 106 0.5× 155 1.9× 42 0.8× 38 0.7× 38 641
Kishokanth Jeganathan Poland 5 198 0.7× 132 0.7× 135 1.7× 33 0.6× 70 1.3× 6 583
Cătălin Maican Romania 9 125 0.5× 195 1.0× 71 0.9× 59 1.1× 41 0.8× 28 459
ChongWoo Park United States 11 150 0.6× 138 0.7× 124 1.5× 49 0.9× 52 1.0× 18 555
Helena Rodrigues Portugal 12 173 0.6× 258 1.3× 93 1.1× 33 0.6× 65 1.2× 18 681
Z. Haag United Kingdom 5 248 0.9× 290 1.5× 96 1.2× 33 0.6× 24 0.5× 7 620
Lokman Mohd Tahir Malaysia 13 408 1.5× 77 0.4× 91 1.1× 57 1.0× 13 0.2× 110 689
Paloma Escamilla-Fajardo Spain 11 84 0.3× 207 1.0× 66 0.8× 66 1.2× 39 0.7× 36 427

Countries citing papers authored by Tena B. Crews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tena B. Crews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tena B. Crews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tena B. Crews more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tena B. Crews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tena B. Crews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tena B. Crews. The network helps show where Tena B. Crews may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tena B. Crews

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tena B. Crews. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tena B. Crews based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tena B. Crews. Tena B. Crews is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kline, Sheryl F., et al.. (2017). Virtual and Hybrid Meetings: Gaining Generational Insight From Industry Experts. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration. 18(2). 133–170. 12 indexed citations
2.
Kline, Sheryl F., et al.. (2013). Identifying best practices, opportunities and barriers in meeting planning for Generation Y. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 36. 244–254. 30 indexed citations
3.
Crews, Tena B., et al.. (2010). Understanding True Colors Personality Trait Spectrums of Hotel, Restaurant, and Tourism Management Students to Enhance Classroom Instruction. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism. 10(1). 22–41. 8 indexed citations
4.
Crews, Tena B., et al.. (2009). Preparing Student Teaching Interns: Advice from Current Business Educators.. Delta Pi Epsilon journal. 51(1). 43–55. 8 indexed citations
5.
Brookshire, Robert G., et al.. (2009). Student Success in a University Introductory Networks and Telecommunications Course. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education. 5(1). 53–61. 2 indexed citations
6.
Crews, Tena B., et al.. (2008). Workload Management Strategies for Online Educators. Delta Pi Epsilon journal. 50(3). 132–149. 9 indexed citations
7.
Crews, Tena B., et al.. (2007). Student Campus Technology Trends: 2001 versus 2006.. ˜The œEDUCAUSE quarterly/EDUCAUSE quarterly. 30(4). 30–36. 4 indexed citations
8.
Crews, Tena B.. (2007). How Professional Organizations Can Help Meet the Professional Development Needs of Middle School Business and Technology Educators.. Delta Pi Epsilon journal. 49(2). 140–146. 1 indexed citations
9.
Brookshire, Robert G., et al.. (2007). An End-User Information Systems Curriculum for the 21St Century. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 47(3). 81–88. 15 indexed citations
10.
Wilkinson, Kelly, et al.. (2006). Converting Assessment of Traditional Classroom Assignments to the e-Learning Environment. OpenSIUC (Southern Illinois University Carbondale). 2(2). 2. 5 indexed citations
11.
Crews, Tena B.. (2006). Networks and Telecommunications Course Content Lists: A Comparison between it Educators and Industry Personnel. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 47(2). 58–65. 1 indexed citations
12.
Wilkinson, Kelly, et al.. (2005). Synchronous Versus Asynchronous: Delivery of Online Instruction and the Factors that Lead to Success or Failure. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2005(1). 2253–2257. 1 indexed citations
13.
Crews, Tena B.. (2004). Telecommunications Course Content: Input from Information Technology Professionals.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 15(4). 417–426. 13 indexed citations
14.
Crews, Tena B.. (2002). Fundamentals of Insurance. 1 indexed citations
15.
Crews, Tena B., et al.. (2000). Assessing the technology training needs of elementary school teachers. 8(2). 111–121. 48 indexed citations
16.
Crews, Tena B., et al.. (2000). Comparison of Communication Skills Needed by Information Systems Undergraduates and Graduates as Perceived by Information Systems Professionals. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 11(3). 151–156. 2 indexed citations
17.
Crews, Tena B., et al.. (1999). Most Common Grammatical and Punctuation Errors Made by Undergraduates as Perceived by Business Communication Professors.. Delta Pi Epsilon journal. 41(4). 1 indexed citations
18.
Stitt-Gohdes, Wanda L., et al.. (1999). Business Teachers' Learning and Instructional Styles.. Delta Pi Epsilon journal. 41(2). 71–88. 8 indexed citations
19.
Crews, Tena B., et al.. (1999). Utilizing the Evaluation Process in CD-ROM Development.. Delta Pi Epsilon journal. 41(1). 14–25. 1 indexed citations
20.
Crews, Tena B. & Wanda L. Stitt-Gohdes. (1995). Ratings of the Georgia Business Education Industry Certification Standards by Georgia Educators and Business and Industry Personnel.. Delta Pi Epsilon journal. 37(1). 46–65.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026