Teddy Novais

32 papers receiving 260 citations

Peers

Teddy Novais
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 50
  • Family Practice 22
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 64
  • Nephrology 14
  • General Health Professions 35
Replace S. Lane Slabaugh with:
S. Lane Slabaugh United States
Laura K. Triantafylidis United States
Frank W. K. Chan Hong Kong
Barry Jubraj United Kingdom
Céline Buffel du Vaure France
Sergi Blancafort Alias Spain
Cledir de Araújo Amaral Brazil
Shiah‐Lian Chen Taiwan
Josephine To Australia
Henry Smithson Ireland
Teddy Novais relative to S. Lane Slabaugh United States S. Lane Slabaugh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
S. Lane Slabaugh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Teddy Novais

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Teddy Novais's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Teddy Novais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Teddy Novais more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Teddy Novais

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Teddy Novais. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Teddy Novais. The network helps show where Teddy Novais may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Teddy Novais, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Teddy Novais Line = papers co-authored together Teddy Novais links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201751
2 201638
3 201532
4 202229
5 201517
6 202016
7 202114
8 20206
9 20185
10 20165
11 20215
12 20245
13 20245
14 20194
15 20214
16 20214
17 20253
18 20153
19 20242
20 20232

About Teddy Novais

Teddy Novais is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Hematology, Nephrology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Family Practice, having authored 37 papers that have together received 264 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (10 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (4 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (1 paper) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (50 citations), Family Practice (22 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (64 citations), Nephrology (14 citations) and General Health Professions (35 citations). Teddy Novais has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Pierre Krolak‐Salmon, Christelle Mouchoux, Virginie Dauphinot, Floriane Delphin‐Combe, Alexandra L. Dima, Marie Paule Schneider, Anne‐Marie Schott, Frédéric Gervais, Marie Viprey and V. Chamouard. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, Patient Education and Counseling, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, The journal of nutrition health & aging and Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact