Philippe Cestac

1.8k citations
60 papers · 867 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Philippe Cestac

57 papers receiving 846 citations

Peers

Philippe Cestac
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 296
  • Family Practice 55
  • Internal Medicine 46
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 184
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 273
Replace Linda R. Tulner with:
Linda R. Tulner Netherlands
Irene Marzona Italy
S. Yu. Martsevich Russia
Jamie N. Brown United States
Ivy O. Poon United States
Mehmet İlkin Naharcı Türkiye
M. Feely United Kingdom
P.H.M. van der Kuy Netherlands
Yu-Wen Wen Taiwan
Chia‐Ing Li Taiwan
Philippe Cestac relative to Linda R. Tulner Netherlands Linda R. Tulner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.0×
Linda R. Tulner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philippe Cestac

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philippe Cestac's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philippe Cestac with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philippe Cestac more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philippe Cestac

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philippe Cestac. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philippe Cestac. The network helps show where Philippe Cestac may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philippe Cestac, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philippe Cestac Line = papers co-authored together Philippe Cestac links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015168
2 201478
3 202063
4 200352
5 201450
6 202243
7 201843
8 200337
9 202224
10 201623
11 202320
12 202119
13 201519
14 200317
15 201913
16 201813
17 201812
18 201810
19 202010
20 202010

About Philippe Cestac

Philippe Cestac is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Economics and Econometrics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health and Family Practice, having authored 60 papers that have together received 867 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (25 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (13 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (11 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (10 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (9 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (7 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (7 papers) and Pharmaceutical studies and practices (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (296 citations), Family Practice (55 citations), Internal Medicine (46 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (184 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (273 citations). Philippe Cestac has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Lebanon. Frequent co-authors include Laure Rouch, Bruno Vellas, Olivier Hanon, Charlène Cool, Yves Rolland, Philipe de Souto Barreto, Sandrine Andrieu, Maryse Lapeyre‐Mestre, B Chamontin and Catherine Helmer. Their work appears in journals such as The journal of nutrition health & aging, Journal of Hypertension, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact