Tea Brummer
Impact in
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 2%
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Ureteral procedures and complications
- Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments 9
- Ureteral procedures and complications 2
- Gynecological conditions and treatments 2
-
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment 5
- Co-authors
- Päivi Härkki (12 shared papers)Jyrki Jalkanen (10 shared papers)Eija Tomás (9 shared papers)Jaana Fraser (6 shared papers)Toni T. Seppälä (1 shared paper)Anna Maria Heikkinen (5 shared papers)J Mäkinen (4 shared papers)J Sjöberg (4 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Tea Brummer
13 papers receiving 443 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 334
- Reproductive Medicine 202
- Surgery 218
- Urology 30
- Internal Medicine 17
Countries citing papers authored by Tea Brummer
This map shows the geographic impact of Tea Brummer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tea Brummer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tea Brummer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tea Brummer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tea Brummer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tea Brummer. The network helps show where Tea Brummer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tea Brummer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 179 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 95 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 54 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 12 | Hysterectomy for benign indications in Finland | 2012 | 2 |
| 13 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 0 |
About Tea Brummer
Tea Brummer is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Surgery, Rheumatology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (9 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (5 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (5 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (4 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (3 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (2 papers) and Gynecological conditions and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (334 citations), Reproductive Medicine (202 citations), Surgery (218 citations), Urology (30 citations) and Internal Medicine (17 citations). Tea Brummer has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Norway and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Päivi Härkki, Jyrki Jalkanen, Eija Tomás, Jaana Fraser, Toni T. Seppälä, Anna Maria Heikkinen, J Mäkinen, J Sjöberg, Minna Kauko and Timo Seppälä. Their work appears in journals such as Human Reproduction, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, Cancer and Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.