Jaana Fraser

756 total citations
9 papers, 570 citations indexed

About

Jaana Fraser is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jaana Fraser has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 570 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 2 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Jaana Fraser's work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (8 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (5 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers). Jaana Fraser is often cited by papers focused on Uterine Myomas and Treatments (8 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (5 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers). Jaana Fraser collaborates with scholars based in Finland and Norway. Jaana Fraser's co-authors include Päivi Härkki, Jyrki Jalkanen, J Mäkinen, Eija Tomás, Tea Brummer, Anna Maria Heikkinen, J Sjöberg, Minna Kauko, Timo Seppälä and Pia Suvitie and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Cancer, Human Reproduction and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

In The Last Decade

Jaana Fraser

8 papers receiving 552 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jaana Fraser Finland 7 350 347 215 59 42 9 570
Maria B. Schiavone United States 10 284 0.8× 290 0.8× 219 1.0× 59 1.0× 12 0.3× 23 538
M. E. Romanini Italy 16 513 1.5× 596 1.7× 146 0.7× 79 1.3× 116 2.8× 24 802
Scott E. Lentz United States 11 358 1.0× 399 1.1× 236 1.1× 26 0.4× 16 0.4× 34 605
Z Holub Czechia 17 572 1.6× 765 2.2× 188 0.9× 21 0.4× 94 2.2× 60 914
Céline Lönnerfors Sweden 14 484 1.4× 772 2.2× 234 1.1× 16 0.3× 14 0.3× 28 867
Sue Valmadre United States 8 167 0.5× 206 0.6× 159 0.7× 22 0.4× 37 0.9× 11 396
Mildred Ridgway United States 6 233 0.7× 442 1.3× 251 1.2× 24 0.4× 12 0.3× 14 617
Pedro T. Ramirez United States 13 203 0.6× 396 1.1× 186 0.9× 22 0.4× 7 0.2× 24 549
Luigi Carlo Turco Italy 17 531 1.5× 546 1.6× 393 1.8× 11 0.2× 17 0.4× 44 837
Ali Yavuzcan Türkiye 12 142 0.4× 210 0.6× 68 0.3× 23 0.4× 75 1.8× 48 389

Countries citing papers authored by Jaana Fraser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jaana Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaana Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaana Fraser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jaana Fraser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaana Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaana Fraser. The network helps show where Jaana Fraser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jaana Fraser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jaana Fraser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jaana Fraser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jaana Fraser. Jaana Fraser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Brummer, Tea, Jyrki Jalkanen, Jaana Fraser, et al.. (2015). Hysterectomies In Finland in 1990–2012—Comparison of Outcomes Between Trainees and Specialists. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 70(8). 496–498.
2.
Brummer, Tea, Jyrki Jalkanen, Jaana Fraser, et al.. (2015). Hysterectomies in Finland in 1990–2012: comparison of outcomes between trainees and specialists. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 94(7). 701–707. 18 indexed citations
3.
Mäkinen, Juha, Tea Brummer, Jyrki Jalkanen, et al.. (2013). Ten years of progress—improved hysterectomy outcomes in Finland 1996–2006: a longitudinal observation study. BMJ Open. 3(10). e003169–e003169. 54 indexed citations
4.
Jalkanen, Jyrki, Jaana Fraser, J Mäkinen, et al.. (2013). Antibiotic prophylaxis for hysterectomy, a prospective cohort study: cefuroxime, metronidazole, or both?. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 120(10). 1269–1276. 13 indexed citations
5.
Brummer, Tea, Anna Maria Heikkinen, Jyrki Jalkanen, et al.. (2012). Pharmaceutical thrombosis prophylaxis, bleeding complications and thromboembolism in a national cohort of hysterectomy for benign disease. Human Reproduction. 27(6). 1628–1636. 16 indexed citations
6.
Brummer, Tea, Jyrki Jalkanen, Jaana Fraser, et al.. (2011). FINHYST, a prospective study of 5279 hysterectomies: complications and their risk factors. Human Reproduction. 26(7). 1741–1751. 179 indexed citations
7.
Setälä, Marjaleena, Päivi Härkki, Pia Suvitie, et al.. (2011). Is the presence of endometrioma always associated with more severe disease?. Gynecological Surgery. 8(3). 299–304. 2 indexed citations
8.
Huhtinen, Kaisa, Pia Suvitie, Jouni Junnila, et al.. (2009). Serum HE4 concentration differentiates malignant ovarian tumours from ovarian endometriotic cysts. British Journal of Cancer. 100(8). 1315–1319. 233 indexed citations
9.
Brummer, Tea, Jyrki Jalkanen, Jaana Fraser, et al.. (2009). FINHYST 2006--national prospective 1-year survey of 5 279 hysterectomies. Human Reproduction. 24(10). 2515–2522. 55 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026