Tao Chi

479 citations
36 papers · 341 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Tao Chi

33 papers receiving 327 citations

Peers

Tao Chi
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 84
  • Biological Psychiatry 9
  • Computer Networks and Communications 81
  • Media Technology 24
Replace Zhihua Hu with:
Zhihua Hu China
Yinglong Li China
Young‐Ho Park South Korea
Muhammad Akmal Remli Malaysia
Dehai Zhang China
Samreen Naeem Pakistan
Anupama Mishra India
K. Kousalya India
Shashank Yadav India
Yusheng Su China
Tao Chi relative to Zhihua Hu China Zhihua Hu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.2×
Zhihua Hu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tao Chi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tao Chi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tao Chi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tao Chi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tao Chi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tao Chi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tao Chi. The network helps show where Tao Chi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tao Chi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tao Chi Line = papers co-authored together Tao Chi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201945
2 201838
3 201430
4 201727
5 201925
6 201722
7 200819
8 201717
9 201817
10 201812
11 201812
12 201912
13 202410
14 20189
15 20199
16 20196
17 20174
18 20223
19 20103
20 20173

About Tao Chi

Tao Chi is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 36 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include AI in cancer detection (4 papers), Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases (3 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (3 papers), Industrial Gas Emission Control (3 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (3 papers), Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks (3 papers), Caching and Content Delivery (3 papers) and COVID-19 diagnosis using AI (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (7 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (84 citations), Biological Psychiatry (9 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (81 citations) and Media Technology (24 citations). Tao Chi has collaborated with scholars based in China, Japan and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Kehua Guo, Y. A. Tang, Tao Xu, Jianhua Ma, Deepak Kumar Jain, Ming Chen, Sheng Ren, Xiaoyan Kui, Zhao‐Xi Wang and Ming Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Ad Hoc Networks, Future Generation Computer Systems, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, Electronics and Signal Processing Image Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact