Tanya Pike
About
In The Last Decade
Tanya Pike
8 papers receiving 579 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Oncology 438
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 345
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 237
- Molecular Biology 163
- Surgery 83
Countries citing papers authored by Tanya Pike
This map shows the geographic impact of Tanya Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tanya Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tanya Pike more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tanya Pike
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tanya Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tanya Pike. The network helps show where Tanya Pike may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tanya Pike
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tanya Pike. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tanya Pike based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tanya Pike. Tanya Pike is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 30 | |
| 6 | 80 | |
| 7 | 423 | |
| 8 | A prospective study of BRAF and K-ras mutations in colorectal polyps: location, histologic subtype and clinical relevance | 5 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.