Roger Stenling

562 total citations
8 papers, 474 citations indexed

About

Roger Stenling is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Roger Stenling has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 474 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 4 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Roger Stenling's work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (5 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (3 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers). Roger Stenling is often cited by papers focused on Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (5 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (3 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers). Roger Stenling collaborates with scholars based in Sweden. Roger Stenling's co-authors include G Lindmark, Björn Tavelin, Åke Öberg, Börje Ljungberg, Carlos Rubio-Terrés, Heléne Fischer, Annika Lindblom, Farhood Alamdari, Göran Landberg and Richard Palmqvist and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal Of Pathology, International Journal of Cancer and European Urology.

In The Last Decade

Roger Stenling

8 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Roger Stenling Sweden	8	233	210	165	134	98	8	474
Ichio Shibagaki Japan	7	276 1.2×	312 1.5×	110 0.7×	217 1.6×	107 1.1×	12	530
Rita El‐Khoueiry United States	12	285 1.2×	196 0.9×	159 1.0×	125 0.9×	116 1.2×	38	534
Annika Ålgars Finland	14	393 1.7×	147 0.7×	161 1.0×	122 0.9×	111 1.1×	34	657
Hiroki Fukunaga Japan	10	241 1.0×	173 0.8×	97 0.6×	140 1.0×	83 0.8×	23	474
T. Wiggers Netherlands	11	204 0.9×	81 0.4×	102 0.6×	142 1.1×	94 1.0×	15	451
Akihiro Kitaoka Japan	9	162 0.7×	207 1.0×	141 0.9×	140 1.0×	116 1.2×	21	431
De Sen Wan China	9	247 1.1×	119 0.6×	85 0.5×	65 0.5×	55 0.6×	35	416
K Yoshikawa Japan	7	96 0.4×	180 0.9×	141 0.9×	79 0.6×	109 1.1×	17	417
Hiroyuki Maeta Japan	11	146 0.6×	191 0.9×	79 0.5×	56 0.4×	96 1.0×	24	419
Kelly M. Bailey United States	11	179 0.8×	278 1.3×	137 0.8×	95 0.7×	115 1.2×	30	552

Countries citing papers authored by Roger Stenling

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roger Stenling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger Stenling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger Stenling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roger Stenling

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger Stenling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger Stenling. The network helps show where Roger Stenling may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roger Stenling

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roger Stenling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roger Stenling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roger Stenling. Roger Stenling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Fischer, Heléne, Sima Salahshor, Roger Stenling, et al.. (2001). COL11A1 in FAP polyps and in sporadic colorectal tumors. BMC Cancer. 1(1). 17–17. 47 indexed citations

2.

Fischer, Heléne, Roger Stenling, Carlos Rubio-Terrés, & Annika Lindblom. (2001). Differential expression of Aquaporin 8 in human colonic epithelial cells and colorectal tumors. BMC Physiology. 1(1). 1–1. 87 indexed citations

3.

Cederquist, Kristina, et al.. (2001). A population based cohort study of patients with multiple colon and endometrial cancer: Correlation of microsatellite instability (msi) status, age at diagnosis and cancer risk. International Journal of Cancer. 91(4). 486–491. 20 indexed citations

4.

Palmqvist, Richard, et al.. (2000). Human Colorectal Cancers with an Intact p16/Cyclin D1/pRb Pathway Have Up-Regulated p16 Expression and Decreased Proliferation in Small Invasive Tumor Clusters. American Journal Of Pathology. 157(6). 1947–1953. 67 indexed citations

5.

Ljungberg, Börje, et al.. (1999). Prognostic Significance of the Heidelberg Classification of Renal Cell Carcinoma. European Urology. 36(6). 565–569. 87 indexed citations

6.

Öberg, Åke, Roger Stenling, Björn Tavelin, & G Lindmark. (1998). Are lymph node micrometastases of any clinical significance in dukes stages A and B colorectal cancer?. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 41(10). 1244–1249. 136 indexed citations

7.

Mehle, C, et al.. (1993). DNA fingerprinting of renal cell carcinoma with special reference to tumor heterogeneity. Genes Chromosomes and Cancer. 6(2). 86–91. 7 indexed citations

8.

Ljungberg, Börje, et al.. (1988). Tumor spread and DNA content in human renal cell carcinoma.. PubMed. 48(11). 3165–7. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact