Tanya M. M. Button

1.3k citations
17 papers · 912 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Tanya M. M. Button

17 papers receiving 872 citations

Peers

Tanya M. M. Button
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Clinical Psychology 541
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 233
  • Applied Psychology 59
  • Health 59
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 104
Replace Lisa N. Legrand with:
Lisa N. Legrand United States
Hanneke E. Creemers Netherlands
Jackson A. Goodnight United States
Anne N. Banducci United States
Danielle Keenan‐Miller United States
Vivia V. McCutcheon United States
Kate B. Nooner United States
Grace McNamara United States
Elizabeth Kelley Canada
Ori Shinar United States
Tanya M. M. Button relative to Lisa N. Legrand United States Lisa N. Legrand's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Lisa N. Legrand · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tanya M. M. Button

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tanya M. M. Button's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tanya M. M. Button with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tanya M. M. Button more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tanya M. M. Button

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tanya M. M. Button. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tanya M. M. Button. The network helps show where Tanya M. M. Button may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Tanya M. M. Button, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tanya M. M. Button Line = papers co-authored together Tanya M. M. Button links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2008125
2 2007107
3 200595
4 200792
5 200572
6 200766
7 200763
8 201259
9 200656
10 200647
11 201032
12 201031
13 200825
14 200424
15 201315
16
Peer delinquency and the heritability of dependence vulnerability
20082
17 20061

About Tanya M. M. Button

Tanya M. M. Button is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 912 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (12 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (10 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (3 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (541 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (233 citations), Applied Psychology (59 citations), Health (59 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (104 citations). Tanya M. M. Button has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John K. Hewitt, Soo Hyun Rhee, Michael C. Stallings, Robin P. Corley, Peter McGuffin, Barbara Maughan, Jason D. Boardman, Casey L. Blalock, Susan E. Young and Anita Thapar. Their work appears in journals such as Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Twin Research and Human Genetics, Behavior Genetics, Psychological Medicine and Journal of Family Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact