Tang-Chuan Wang

24 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers

Tang-Chuan Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Sensory Systems 95
  • Otorhinolaryngology 33
  • Speech and Hearing 44
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 11
  • Neurology 36
Replace Jianxin Qiu with:
Jianxin Qiu China
Celene McNeill Australia
Andrzej Włodarczyk Poland
E. Biesinger Germany
Min Young Kwak South Korea
Hosam Amoodi Canada
Hiromasa Takakura Japan
Salman F. Alhabib Saudi Arabia
Erin G. Piker United States
Tang-Chuan Wang relative to Jianxin Qiu China Jianxin Qiu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Jianxin Qiu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tang-Chuan Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tang-Chuan Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tang-Chuan Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tang-Chuan Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tang-Chuan Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tang-Chuan Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tang-Chuan Wang. The network helps show where Tang-Chuan Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tang-Chuan Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tang-Chuan Wang Line = papers co-authored together Tang-Chuan Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202044
2 201536
3 201625
4 201722
5 202122
6 202121
7 201618
8 201615
9 201414
10 20228
11 20216
12 20226
13 20166
14 20224
15 20194
16 20193
17 20202
18 20242
19 20212
20 20141

About Tang-Chuan Wang

Tang-Chuan Wang is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience, Otorhinolaryngology, Neurology and Speech and Hearing, having authored 27 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (12 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (5 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (4 papers), Noise Effects and Management (3 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (3 papers), Sinusitis and nasal conditions (2 papers) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (95 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (33 citations), Speech and Hearing (44 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (11 citations) and Neurology (36 citations). Tang-Chuan Wang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Chia‐Der Lin, Richard S. Tyler, Cheng‐Li Lin, Ta-Yuan Chang, Fuh-Cherng Jeng, Ming‐Hsui Tsai, Yung‐An Tsou, Wen‐Miin Liang, Chia‐Hung Kao and Ming‐Chia Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Computers in Biology and Medicine, Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, Medicine and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact