Tammy Clewell

447 citations
11 papers · 134 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • Modernist Literature and Criticism
    • Contemporary Literature and Criticism
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis
  • Philosophy top 10%
    • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism

Papers in

Tammy Clewell

9 papers receiving 88 citations

Peers

Tammy Clewell
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Literature and Literary Theory 46
  • Philosophy 25
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 9
  • Clinical Psychology 38
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 2
Replace James Giles with:
James Giles United States
Sue Vice United Kingdom
Susan Rowland United Kingdom
Roger Kennedy United Kingdom
Sophocles
James Berger United States
Rüdiger Safranski United States
Rainer María Rilke
Allan Ingram United Kingdom
Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen United States
Tammy Clewell relative to James Giles United States James Giles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
James Giles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tammy Clewell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tammy Clewell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tammy Clewell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tammy Clewell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tammy Clewell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tammy Clewell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tammy Clewell. The network helps show where Tammy Clewell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Tammy Clewell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tammy Clewell Line = papers co-authored together Tammy Clewell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 200479
2 200428
3 20137
4
Modernism and Nostalgia : Bodies, Locations, Aesthetics
20135
5 20095
6 20193
7 20173
8 20042
9
The Shades of Modern Mourning in Three Colours Trilogy
20001
10 19971
11 20200

About Tammy Clewell

Tammy Clewell is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology, History, Philosophy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 11 papers that have together received 134 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior (2 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (2 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (2 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper), German History and Society (1 paper), European history and politics (1 paper) and Borges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (46 citations), Philosophy (25 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (9 citations), Clinical Psychology (38 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (2 citations). Tammy Clewell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Byron, Deborah R. Barnbaum, Mark Bracher, Nancy M. Docherty and Susan Roxburgh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, Literature film quarterly, American imago and Modern fiction studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact