Tamás Végh
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Neurology
- Epidemiology
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 10%
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Béla FülesdiCsilla MolnárÁkos CsomósIstván TakácsDaniel I. SesslerAttila EnyediDénes PállÁkos Fábián
- Topics
- Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (6 papers)Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (5 papers)Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers)
- Journals
- Critical CareClinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
- Partner nations
- HungaryUnited StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Tamás Végh
22 papers receiving 185 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 60
- Neurology 58
- Epidemiology 46
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 45
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 40
Countries citing papers authored by Tamás Végh
This map shows the geographic impact of Tamás Végh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tamás Végh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tamás Végh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tamás Végh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tamás Végh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tamás Végh. The network helps show where Tamás Végh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tamás Végh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tamás Végh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tamás Végh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tamás Végh. Tamás Végh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 56 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Tamás Végh
Tamás Végh is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 28 papers that have together received 192 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (6 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (5 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (45 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (40 citations) and Neurology (58 citations). Tamás Végh has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Béla Fülesdi, Csilla Molnár, Ákos Csomós, István Takács, Daniel I. Sessler, Attila Enyedi, Dénes Páll, Ákos Fábián, László L. Szegedi and Ágnes Enyedi. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care, Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) and Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.