Tam N. Pham

4.6k total citations
132 papers, 3.0k citations indexed

About

Tam N. Pham is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Tam N. Pham has authored 132 papers receiving a total of 3.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 84 papers in Epidemiology, 40 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 33 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Tam N. Pham's work include Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (80 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (33 papers) and Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (32 papers). Tam N. Pham is often cited by papers focused on Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (80 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (33 papers) and Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (32 papers). Tam N. Pham collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Ghana. Tam N. Pham's co-authors include Nicole S. Gibran, Matthew B. Klein, Leopoldo C. Cancio, Heather L. Evans, Timo Hakkarainen, Nicole M Kopari, Michael J. Mosier, David G. Greenhalgh, Tina L. Palmieri and C. Bradley Kramer and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Tam N. Pham

127 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tam N. Pham United States 30 1.5k 906 606 579 545 132 3.0k
Gary F. Purdue United States 37 2.0k 1.3× 611 0.7× 660 1.1× 904 1.6× 587 1.1× 114 3.7k
Matthew B. Klein United States 37 2.2k 1.5× 1.2k 1.3× 715 1.2× 1.1k 1.8× 744 1.4× 66 3.6k
Jeffrey R. Saffle United States 43 2.9k 1.9× 1.4k 1.5× 1.1k 1.9× 1.3k 2.3× 849 1.6× 146 5.5k
Sharmila Dissanaike United States 25 520 0.3× 406 0.4× 409 0.7× 240 0.4× 521 1.0× 126 1.9k
Saman Arbabi United States 38 948 0.6× 445 0.5× 1.7k 2.7× 273 0.5× 1.4k 2.6× 146 4.6k
Grant E. O’Keefe United States 38 1.1k 0.8× 429 0.5× 1.2k 1.9× 126 0.2× 1.1k 2.1× 110 4.2k
Falco Hietbrink Netherlands 31 1.3k 0.8× 390 0.4× 728 1.2× 103 0.2× 1.7k 3.1× 167 3.6k
Pieta Krijnen Netherlands 37 1.1k 0.7× 323 0.4× 455 0.8× 477 0.8× 2.3k 4.3× 166 4.4k
Charles H. Cook United States 38 1.2k 0.8× 141 0.2× 487 0.8× 162 0.3× 1.4k 2.7× 143 4.1k
William J. Brady United States 40 617 0.4× 464 0.5× 1.5k 2.6× 96 0.2× 1.5k 2.7× 287 6.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Tam N. Pham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tam N. Pham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tam N. Pham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tam N. Pham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tam N. Pham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tam N. Pham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tam N. Pham. The network helps show where Tam N. Pham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tam N. Pham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tam N. Pham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tam N. Pham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tam N. Pham. Tam N. Pham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mešić, Aldina, et al.. (2025). Understanding drivers of fire risk with people experiencing homelessness. Burns. 51(5). 107482–107482. 1 indexed citations
2.
Pham, Tam N., Ji‐Tseng Fang, Shih‐Ying Chen, et al.. (2025). Effectiveness of Communication Skills Training on Cancer Patients' Outcomes: A Case‐Control Study in Taiwan. Psycho-Oncology. 34(9). e70275–e70275.
3.
Blayney, Carolyn, J. Tate, D. Andrew Tucker, et al.. (2024). Implementation of a geriatric care bundle for older adults with acute burns. Burns. 50(4). 841–849. 1 indexed citations
5.
Stewart, Barclay T., Tam N. Pham, Leopoldo C. Cancio, et al.. (2024). Higher energy delivery is associated with improved long-term survival among adults with major burn injury: A multicenter, multinational, observational study. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 97(5). 812–821. 1 indexed citations
6.
Stanton, Eloise, Yvonne L. Karanas, Tam N. Pham, Justin Gillenwater, & Clifford C. Sheckter. (2024). Inpatient Complications and Outcomes for Burn Patients Admitted With Methamphetamine Intoxication. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 45(4). 1026–1031. 1 indexed citations
7.
Lin, Yuxuan, Tam N. Pham, Li‐Chueh Weng, et al.. (2024). Comparing the Effectiveness of Online and Face-to-Face Teaching for Medical Students in Shared Decision-Making Communication Skills Training. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 40(6). 1403–1410. 1 indexed citations
8.
Morzycki, Alexander, et al.. (2024). 736 Health Literacy in Patients with Burn Injury. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 45(Supplement_1). 218–218. 1 indexed citations
9.
Rizzo, Julie A, Maria Serio-Melvin, James K. Aden, et al.. (2023). 90 Higher Initial Formula for Resuscitation After Severe Burn Injury Means Higher 24-Hour Volumes. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 44(Supplement_2). S50–S50. 1 indexed citations
10.
Stanton, Eloise, Justin Gillenwater, Tam N. Pham, & Clifford C. Sheckter. (2022). Temperature Derangement on Admission is Associated With Mortality in Burn Patients—A Nationwide Analysis and Opportunity for Improvement. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 44(4). 845–851. 3 indexed citations
11.
Hickerson, William L., Jeremy Goverman, Sigrid A Blome-Eberwein, et al.. (2021). T2 One Year Follow up Results of the DETECT Enzymatic Debridement Multicenter RCT. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 42(Supplement_1). S1–S2. 2 indexed citations
12.
Sheckter, Clifford C., Gretchen J. Carrougher, Kara McMullen, et al.. (2020). Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Burn Survivors Undergoing Reconstructive Surgery in the Rehabilitative Period. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 146(1). 171–182. 12 indexed citations
13.
Yenikomshian, Haig A, et al.. (2018). Evaluation of Burn Rounds Using Telemedicine: Perspectives from Patients, Families, and Burn Center Staff. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health. 25(1). 25–30. 19 indexed citations
14.
Brown, David Alan, et al.. (2015). Propranolol Dosing Practices in Adult Burn Patients. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 37(3). e218–e226. 18 indexed citations
15.
Lovrecz, George O., Carina C. D. Joe, Tram Phan, et al.. (2014). Monoclonal antibody production for pharmaceutical research: A practical guide. 602. 1 indexed citations
16.
Kastenmeier, Andrew, Iris Faraklas, Amalia Cochran, et al.. (2010). The Evolution of Resource Utilization in Regional Burn Centers. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 31(1). 130–136. 24 indexed citations
17.
Pham, Tam N., Merilyn L. Moore, B. A. Costa, Joseph Cuschieri, & Matthew B. Klein. (2009). Assessment of Functional Limitation After Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 30(2). 301–306. 42 indexed citations
18.
Pham, Tam N. & Nicole S. Gibran. (2007). Lesiones térmicas y eléctricas. 185–206. 1 indexed citations
20.
Cho, Kiho, et al.. (2003). Regulation of murine endogenous retroviruses in the thymus after injury1,2. Journal of Surgical Research. 115(2). 318–324. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026