Craig R. Smith
- Surgery top 0.5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 1%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 2%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Paul S. LietmanRichard D. MooreDavid M. OrnitzEric A. RoseMichael ArgenzianoEdward L. HannanJeffrey P. GoldAndrew C. White
- Topics
- Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (26 papers)Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (18 papers)Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Craig R. Smith
108 papers receiving 5.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
- Surgery 3.2k
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.7k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.3k
- Epidemiology 874
- Molecular Biology 744
Countries citing papers authored by Craig R. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Craig R. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Craig R. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Craig R. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Craig R. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Craig R. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Craig R. Smith. The network helps show where Craig R. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Craig R. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Craig R. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Craig R. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Craig R. Smith. Craig R. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 113 | |
| 8 | 176 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 87 | |
| 11 | 53 | |
| 12 | Bronchial anastomotic complications after lung transplantation | 1 |
| 13 | 78 | |
| 14 | 108 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 62 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Craig R. Smith
Craig R. Smith is a scholar working on Transplantation, Surgery and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 113 papers that have together received 6.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (26 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (18 papers) and Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (289 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.7k citations) and Surgery (3.2k citations). Craig R. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Paul S. Lietman, Richard D. Moore, David M. Ornitz, Eric A. Rose, Michael Argenziano, Edward L. Hannan, Jeffrey P. Gold, Andrew C. White, Chuntao Wu and Alfred T. Culliford. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Circulation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.