Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Agglomeration and Trade Revisited*
2002581 citationsGianmarco I.P. Ottaviano, Takatoshi Tabuchi et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Takatoshi Tabuchi
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Takatoshi Tabuchi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Takatoshi Tabuchi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Takatoshi Tabuchi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Takatoshi Tabuchi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Takatoshi Tabuchi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Takatoshi Tabuchi. The network helps show where Takatoshi Tabuchi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Takatoshi Tabuchi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Takatoshi Tabuchi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Takatoshi Tabuchi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Takatoshi Tabuchi. Takatoshi Tabuchi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Koster, Hans, Takatoshi Tabuchi, & Jacques‐François Thisse. (2021). To Be Connected or Not to Be Connected? The Role of Long-Haul Economies. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Picard, Pierre M. & Takatoshi Tabuchi. (2010). City with forward and backward linkages. Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona). 1.1 indexed citations
Behrens, Kristian, Andrea Lamorgese, Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano, & Takatoshi Tabuchi. (2005). Changes in Infrastructure and Tariff Barriers: Local Vs. Global Impacts. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 37. 625–648.7 indexed citations
11.
Tabuchi, Takatoshi, Jacques‐François Thisse, & Dao‐Zhi Zeng. (2005). On the number and size of cities*. Journal of Economic Geography. 5(4). 423–448.3 indexed citations
12.
Behrens, Kristian, Andrea Lamorgese, Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano, & Takatoshi Tabuchi. (2004). Testing the Home Market Effect in a Multi-Country World: The Theory. SSRN Electronic Journal.24 indexed citations
13.
Tabuchi, Takatoshi, et al.. (2003). Locational Disadvantage and Losses from Trade : Three Regions in Economic Geography. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.4 indexed citations
14.
Tabuchi, Takatoshi & Jacques‐François Thisse. (2002). Regional Specialization and Transport Costs. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
15.
Tabuchi, Takatoshi & Atsushi Yoshida. (2001). Separating Urban Agglomeration Economies in Consumption and Production. SSRN Electronic Journal.8 indexed citations
16.
Tabuchi, Takatoshi, Jacques‐François Thisse, & Dao‐Zhi Zeng. (2001). On the Evolution of a Multi-regional System. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.