This map shows the geographic impact of Eduardo Engel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eduardo Engel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eduardo Engel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eduardo Engel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eduardo Engel. The network helps show where Eduardo Engel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eduardo Engel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eduardo Engel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eduardo Engel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Eduardo Engel. Eduardo Engel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Engel, Eduardo, Ronald Fischer, & Alexander Galetovic. (2010). The economics of infrastructure finance: Public-Private Partnerships versus public provision. Econstor (Econstor). 15(1). 40–69.59 indexed citations
6.
Engel, Eduardo, Ronald Fischer, & Alexander Galetovic. (2010). The economic or infrastructure finance: Public-Private Partnership versus public provision.. 15(1). 40–69.1 indexed citations
7.
Bachmann, Ruediger, Ricardo J. Caballero, & Eduardo Engel. (2006). Lumpy Investment in Dynamic General Equilibrium. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
8.
Engel, Eduardo & Ricardo J. Caballero. (2004). Three Strikes and You're Out: Reply to Cooper and Willis. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
9.
Micco, Alejandro, et al.. (2004). Flexibilidad Microeconómica en América Latina. 7(2). 5–26.4 indexed citations
10.
Engel, Eduardo & Ricardo J. Caballero. (2003). Adjustment is Much Slower than You Think. SSRN Electronic Journal.11 indexed citations
11.
Engel, Eduardo, Alexander Galetovic, & Ronald Fischer. (2003). Privatizing Highways in Latin America: Is It Possible to Fix What Went Wrong?. Econstor (Econstor).2 indexed citations
12.
Engel, Eduardo, Ronald Fischer, & Alexander Galetovic. (2001). How to Auction an Essential Facility When Underhand Integration is Possible. National Bureau of Economic Research.1 indexed citations
13.
Galetovic, Alexander & Eduardo Engel. (2000). Qué hacer con los impuestos a las ganancias de capital. 199–236.1 indexed citations
14.
Engel, Eduardo, Ronald Fischer, & Alexander Galetovic. (2000). Franchising of infrastructure concessions in Chile: A Policy Report. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.4 indexed citations
15.
Engel, Eduardo, Ronald Fischer, & Alexander Galetovic. (1999). The Chilean Infrastructure Concessions Program: Evaluation, Lessons and Prospects for the Future. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.11 indexed citations
16.
Engel, Eduardo, Ronald Fischer, & Alexander Galetovic. (1998). Infrastructure Franchising and Government Guarantees. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 13(1). 51–74.21 indexed citations
17.
Engel, Eduardo, Ronald Fischer, & Alexander Galetovic. (1997). Highway Franchising: Pitfalls and Opportunities. American Economic Review. 87(2). 68–72.85 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.