T. Marek

56 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers

T. Marek
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Pharmaceutical Science 54
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 124
  • Polymers and Plastics 83
  • Biomaterials 76
  • Materials Chemistry 173
Replace A. Reiche with:
A. Reiche Germany
V. M. Rudoy Russia
Nadeem Sabir Pakistan
Bibhuti B. Nayak India
Guo‐Zhi Han China
Marianna Pannico Italy
О. В. Дементьева Russia
P. Santiago Mexico
Wenkang Tu China
T. Marek relative to A. Reiche Germany A. Reiche's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
A. Reiche · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. Marek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Marek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Marek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Marek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Marek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Marek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Marek. The network helps show where T. Marek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. Marek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. Marek Line = papers co-authored together T. Marek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201263
2 201241
3 200334
4 200831
5 201924
6 200521
7 199321
8 201221
9 200220
10 200618
11 200617
12 200917
13 199715
14 201914
15 199912
16 200112
17 199911
18 19969
19 20048
20 20038

About T. Marek

T. Marek is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 57 papers that have together received 527 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muon and positron interactions and applications (22 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (9 papers), Graphene research and applications (7 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (6 papers), Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (6 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (5 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (5 papers) and Metal complexes synthesis and properties (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (54 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (124 citations), Polymers and Plastics (83 citations), Biomaterials (76 citations) and Materials Chemistry (173 citations). T. Marek has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Károly Süvegh, Ilona Felhősi, A. Vértes, Klára Pintye‐Hódi, Attila Domján, Holger Althues, Stefan Kaskel, Lajos Nyikos, Susanne Dörfler and H. P. Strunk. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Surface Science, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, Journal of Applied Physics and Journal of Power Sources.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact