T. Lock

9.1k total citations
8 papers, 37 citations indexed

About

T. Lock is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, T. Lock has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 37 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Instrumentation, 4 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 2 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in T. Lock's work include Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (5 papers), Spacecraft Design and Technology (2 papers) and Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (2 papers). T. Lock is often cited by papers focused on Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (5 papers), Spacecraft Design and Technology (2 papers) and Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (2 papers). T. Lock collaborates with scholars based in Spain, Italy and United Kingdom. T. Lock's co-authors include D. W. Walker, M. Rowan-Robinson, S. Harris, William O’Mullane, M. Rowan-Robinson, S. Els, G. Comoretto, G. Gracia, Emma Mercier and Diego H. Peluffo-Ordóńez and has published in prestigious journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.

In The Last Decade

T. Lock

6 papers receiving 30 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
T. Lock Spain	3	34	14	2	2	2	8	37
En-Peng Zhang China	3	23 0.7×	13 0.9×	2 1.0×		2 1.0×	3	26
T. Fruth Chile	4	30 0.9×	14 1.0×	2 1.0×		2 1.0×	4	31
Naoko Asami Japan	3	26 0.8×	11 0.8×	2 1.0×	3 1.5×		3	27
K. A. Zamudio United States	2	34 1.0×	14 1.0×	2 1.0×		2 1.0×	2	35
E. Brugaletta Italy	2	34 1.0×	13 0.9×	2 1.0×		2 1.0×	2	35
B.-G. Park South Korea	3	28 0.8×	13 0.9×	3 1.5×	1 0.5×	3 1.5×	3	30
Claude E. Mack United States	3	41 1.2×	11 0.8×	2 1.0×		2 1.0×	4	43
Sebastian Oliver United Kingdom	3	22 0.6×	17 1.2×		2 1.0×	3 1.5×	3	22
László Szigeti Hungary	4	35 1.0×	20 1.4×			2 1.0×	6	38
M. D. Suran Romania	3	32 0.9×	15 1.1×			3 1.5×	13	32

Countries citing papers authored by T. Lock

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Lock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Lock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Lock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Lock

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Lock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Lock. The network helps show where T. Lock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. Lock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. Lock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. Lock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. Lock. T. Lock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Lock, T., et al.. (2014). Generic documentation tree for science ground segments. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9150. 915004–915004. 1 indexed citations

2.

Els, S., T. Lock, G. Comoretto, et al.. (2014). The commissioning of Gaia. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9150. 91500A–91500A. 2 indexed citations

3.

Els, S., T. Lock, G. Comoretto, et al.. (2014). DPAC operations simulation to take up the Gaia challenge. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9150. 915016–915016. 1 indexed citations

4.

Lock, T., Emma Mercier, S. Els, et al.. (2012). Product and quality assurance processes and ECSS compliance within a science ground segment using Gaia as an example. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8449. 84491D–84491D. 1 indexed citations

5.

Comoretto, G., J. Gallegos, S. Els, et al.. (2012). The Information Management Tool (IMT) of Gaia DPAC and its potential as tool for large scale software development projects. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8449. 84490G–84490G.

6.

Mercier, Emma, S. Els, G. Gracia, et al.. (2010). The project office of the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7738. 773810–773810.

7.

Rowan-Robinson, M., T. Lock, D. W. Walker, & S. Harris. (1986). Models for IRAS observations of circumstellar dust shells around late-type stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 222(2). 273–286. 30 indexed citations

8.

Lock, T. & M. Rowan-Robinson. (1983). Predicted source counts for normal and active galaxies at 10-100 m. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 204(1). 1P–6P. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact