T. G. McLaughlin
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 2%
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Mathematical Physics top 10%
- Algebra and Number Theory
- Co-authors
- Gerald E. SacksCarl G. JockuschLeigh B. ClarkK. I. AppelJohn GarhammerFillmore FreemanMarc KasnerHarold Bennett
- Topics
- Advanced Topology and Set Theory (12 papers)Advanced Algebra and Logic (11 papers)Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (10 papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Organic ChemistryJournal of BiomechanicsTransactions of the American Mathematical Society
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
T. G. McLaughlin
37 papers receiving 287 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 311
- Geometry and Topology 176
- Artificial Intelligence 104
- Mathematical Physics 64
- Algebra and Number Theory 44
Countries citing papers authored by T. G. McLaughlin
This map shows the geographic impact of T. G. McLaughlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. G. McLaughlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. G. McLaughlin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by T. G. McLaughlin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. G. McLaughlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. G. McLaughlin. The network helps show where T. G. McLaughlin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. G. McLaughlin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. G. McLaughlin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. G. McLaughlin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. G. McLaughlin. T. G. McLaughlin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About T. G. McLaughlin
T. G. McLaughlin is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 48 papers that have together received 500 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Topology and Set Theory (12 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (11 papers) and Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (176 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (311 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (44 citations). T. G. McLaughlin has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gerald E. Sacks, Carl G. Jockusch, Leigh B. Clark, K. I. Appel, John Garhammer, Fillmore Freeman, Marc Kasner and Harold Bennett. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Journal of Biomechanics and Transactions of the American Mathematical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.