T. C. W. Blanning
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- History top 1%
- Philosophy top 10%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- David Clay LargeGerald L. SolidayDavid CannadineSudhir HazareesinghMelvin RichterMelinda Sandler MorrillMark PellingMargaret Canovan
- Topics
- European Political History Analysis (18 papers)Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (10 papers)French Historical and Cultural Studies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
T. C. W. Blanning
42 papers receiving 291 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Political Science and International Relations 165
- Sociology and Political Science 146
- History 114
- Philosophy 34
- History and Philosophy of Science 33
Countries citing papers authored by T. C. W. Blanning
This map shows the geographic impact of T. C. W. Blanning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. C. W. Blanning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. C. W. Blanning more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by T. C. W. Blanning
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. C. W. Blanning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. C. W. Blanning. The network helps show where T. C. W. Blanning may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. C. W. Blanning
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. C. W. Blanning. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. C. W. Blanning based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. C. W. Blanning. T. C. W. Blanning is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Pursuit of Glory: Europe 1648-1815 | 13 |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 47 | |
| 5 | The eighteenth century : Europe 1688-1815 | 0 |
| 6 | The Oxford history of modern Europe | 10 |
| 7 | The nineteenth century : Europe 1789-1914 | 5 |
| 8 | The Oxford illustrated history of modern Europe | 3 |
| 9 | The rise and fall of the French Revolution | 4 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About T. C. W. Blanning
T. C. W. Blanning is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, History and Museology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European Political History Analysis (18 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (10 papers) and French Historical and Cultural Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (114 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (33 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (165 citations). T. C. W. Blanning has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Clay Large, Gerald L. Soliday, David Cannadine, Sudhir Hazareesingh, Melvin Richter, Melinda Sandler Morrill, Mark Pelling, Margaret Canovan, Claude Nicolet and David E. Barclay. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, German Studies Review and The Journal of Military History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.