Sven Panis

489 total citations
29 papers, 385 citations indexed

About

Sven Panis is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sven Panis has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 385 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 6 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Sven Panis's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (17 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (10 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (9 papers). Sven Panis is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (17 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (10 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (9 papers). Sven Panis collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Germany and United Kingdom. Sven Panis's co-authors include Johan Wagemans, Hans Op de Beeck, Thomas Schmidt, Céline R. Gillebert, Joachim Vandekerckhove, Joris Vangeneugden, Katrien Torfs, Frouke Hermens, Bart Machilsen and Kathleen Vancleef and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience and Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance.

In The Last Decade

Sven Panis

26 papers receiving 377 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sven Panis Belgium 13 346 90 63 50 50 29 385
Mary‐Ellen Large Canada 11 297 0.9× 81 0.9× 40 0.6× 70 1.4× 29 0.6× 15 348
Linus Holm Sweden 9 266 0.8× 69 0.8× 54 0.9× 55 1.1× 40 0.8× 20 350
Todd A. Kelley United States 11 484 1.4× 84 0.9× 54 0.9× 47 0.9× 29 0.6× 12 539
Adrien Chopin France 11 255 0.7× 91 1.0× 19 0.3× 38 0.8× 45 0.9× 22 347
Jennifer E. Corbett United States 12 437 1.3× 130 1.4× 70 1.1× 83 1.7× 19 0.4× 26 479
Cigdem P. Talgar United States 6 427 1.2× 60 0.7× 53 0.8× 56 1.1× 20 0.4× 11 488
Talia L. Retter France 11 441 1.3× 167 1.9× 76 1.2× 57 1.1× 36 0.7× 21 474
Hongsup Shin United States 4 440 1.3× 95 1.1× 23 0.4× 74 1.5× 19 0.4× 6 473
Cristina Meinecke Germany 12 350 1.0× 74 0.8× 58 0.9× 72 1.4× 13 0.3× 26 401
Anna Kosovicheva United States 12 340 1.0× 80 0.9× 42 0.7× 79 1.6× 10 0.2× 36 439

Countries citing papers authored by Sven Panis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sven Panis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sven Panis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sven Panis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sven Panis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sven Panis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sven Panis. The network helps show where Sven Panis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sven Panis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sven Panis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sven Panis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sven Panis. Sven Panis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schmidt, Thomas, et al.. (2022). Response inhibition in the Negative Compatibility Effect in the absence of inhibitory stimulus features. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(1). 219–230. 2 indexed citations
4.
Panis, Sven, et al.. (2020). Temporal dynamics of sequential motor activation in a dual-prime paradigm: Insights from conditional accuracy and hazard functions. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 82(5). 2581–2602. 8 indexed citations
5.
Panis, Sven. (2020). How can we learn what attention is? Response gating via multiple direct routes kept in check by inhibitory control processes. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(1). 238–279. 2 indexed citations
6.
Panis, Sven, Katrien Torfs, Céline R. Gillebert, Johan Wagemans, & Glyn W. Humphreys. (2017). Neuropsychological evidence for the temporal dynamics of category-specific naming. Visual Cognition. 25(1-3). 79–99. 6 indexed citations
7.
Panis, Sven & Thomas Schmidt. (2016). What Is Shaping RT and Accuracy Distributions? Active and Selective Response Inhibition Causes the Negative Compatibility Effect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 28(11). 1651–1671. 23 indexed citations
8.
Panis, Sven & Frouke Hermens. (2013). Time course of spatial contextual interference: Event history analyses of simultaneous masking by nonoverlapping patterns.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 40(1). 129–144. 15 indexed citations
9.
Evers, Kris, Sven Panis, Katrien Torfs, et al.. (2013). Disturbed Interplay Between Mid- and High-Level Vision in ASD? Evidence from a Contour Identification Task with Everyday Objects. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 44(4). 801–815. 18 indexed citations
10.
Panis, Sven, Johan Wagemans, & Hans Op de Beeck. (2010). Dynamic Norm-based Encoding for Unfamiliar Shapes in Human Visual Cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 23(7). 1829–1843. 24 indexed citations
11.
Vancleef, Kathleen, et al.. (2010). Identification of Everyday Objects on the Basis of Gaborized Outline Versions. i-Perception. 1(3). 121–142. 28 indexed citations
12.
Torfs, Katrien, Sven Panis, & Johan Wagemans. (2010). Identification of fragmented object outlines: A dynamic interplay between different component processes. Visual Cognition. 18(8). 1133–1164. 18 indexed citations
13.
Kayaert, Greet, Sven Panis, Hans Op de Beeck, & Johan Wagemans. (2009). Atypical objects are easier to spot. Perception. 38. 164–164. 1 indexed citations
14.
Panis, Sven & Johan Wagemans. (2009). Time-course contingencies in perceptual organization and identification of fragmented object outlines.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 35(3). 661–687. 39 indexed citations
15.
Panis, Sven, Joris Vangeneugden, Hans Op de Beeck, & Johan Wagemans. (2008). The representation of subordinate shape similarity in human occipitotemporal cortex. Journal of Vision. 8(10). 9–9. 25 indexed citations
16.
Gillebert, Céline R., Hans Op de Beeck, Sven Panis, & Johan Wagemans. (2008). Subordinate Categorization Enhances the Neural Selectivity in Human Object-selective Cortex for Fine Shape Differences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 21(6). 1054–1064. 61 indexed citations
17.
Panis, Sven, et al.. (2008). Identification of Everyday Objects on the Basis of Fragmented Outline Versions. Perception. 37(2). 271–289. 36 indexed citations
18.
Vandekerckhove, Joachim, Sven Panis, & Johan Wagemans. (2007). The concavity effect is a compound of local and global effects. Perception & Psychophysics. 69(7). 1253–1260. 17 indexed citations
19.
Panis, Sven, Joris Vangeneugden, Ronald Peeters, et al.. (2005). Perceived similarity between objects of the same category and prototypicality gradients in the lateral occipital complex. 1 indexed citations
20.
Germeys, Filip, et al.. (2004). Transsaccadic integration of bystander locations. Visual Cognition. 11(2-3). 203–234. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026