Susannah Brady

559 total citations
16 papers, 385 citations indexed

About

Susannah Brady is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Physiology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Susannah Brady has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 385 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 7 papers in Physiology and 6 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Susannah Brady's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (8 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (7 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (5 papers). Susannah Brady is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (8 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (7 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (5 papers). Susannah Brady collaborates with scholars based in Australia. Susannah Brady's co-authors include Fiona Bogossian, Kristen Gibbons, Stephanie Fox‐Young, Lisa McKenna, Simon Cooper, Jo Porter, Robyn Cant, Nigel Lee, Helen Hall and Geoffrey Mitchell and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Nursing Studies, Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica and Nurse Education Today.

In The Last Decade

Susannah Brady

16 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Susannah Brady Australia	10	178	115	113	100	83	16	385
Stephanie Fox‐Young Australia	12	160 0.9×	131 1.1×	133 1.2×	23 0.2×	64 0.8×	21	429
Gayle McLelland Australia	13	64 0.4×	151 1.3×	142 1.3×	91 0.9×	76 0.9×	29	424
Claire M. Andrews United States	10	76 0.4×	50 0.4×	110 1.0×	95 0.9×	84 1.0×	26	327
Glenn Posner Canada	11	156 0.9×	116 1.0×	142 1.3×	25 0.3×	14 0.2×	50	411
Jo Porter Australia	8	231 1.3×	71 0.6×	86 0.8×	13 0.1×	38 0.5×	12	383
Richard Pittini Canada	10	117 0.7×	53 0.5×	154 1.4×	38 0.4×	51 0.6×	24	403
Barbara J. Sittner United States	10	339 1.9×	95 0.8×	168 1.5×	18 0.2×	18 0.2×	14	433
Mary Brosnan Ireland	11	52 0.3×	81 0.7×	176 1.6×	83 0.8×	48 0.6×	29	346
Julie‐Anne Fleet Australia	13	17 0.1×	99 0.9×	105 0.9×	108 1.1×	103 1.2×	47	384
Hao Bin Yuan Macao	8	265 1.5×	94 0.8×	169 1.5×	10 0.1×	11 0.1×	20	487

Countries citing papers authored by Susannah Brady

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Susannah Brady's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susannah Brady with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susannah Brady more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Susannah Brady

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susannah Brady. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susannah Brady. The network helps show where Susannah Brady may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susannah Brady

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susannah Brady. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susannah Brady based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Susannah Brady. Susannah Brady is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

Brady, Susannah, Kristen Gibbons, & Fiona Bogossian. (2024). Defining woman-centred care: A concept analysis. Midwifery. 131. 103954–103954. 14 indexed citations

Kearney, Lauren, et al.. (2024). The effects of intravenous hydration regimens in nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 103(7). 1254–1262. 3 indexed citations

Brady, Susannah, Fiona Bogossian, & Kristen Gibbons. (2023). Developing an evidence-based international definition of woman-centred care to inform practice. Women and Birth. 36. S17–S17. 1 indexed citations

Lee, Nigel, et al.. (2023). Consent during labour and birth as observed by midwifery students: A mixed methods study. Women and Birth. 36(6). e574–e581. 7 indexed citations

Brady, Susannah, Fiona Bogossian, & Kristen Gibbons. (2023). Achieving international consensus on the concept of woman-centred care: A Delphi study. Women and Birth. 36(6). e631–e640. 3 indexed citations

Brady, Susannah, et al.. (2022). The barriers to offering non-pharmacological pain management as an initial option for laboring women: A review of the literature. European Journal of Midwifery. 6(June). 1–12. 9 indexed citations

Brady, Susannah, Nigel Lee, Kristen Gibbons, & Fiona Bogossian. (2019). Woman-centred care: An integrative review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 94. 107–119. 62 indexed citations

Brady, Susannah, Fiona Bogossian, & Kristen Gibbons. (2016). Development and piloting the Woman Centred Care Scale (WCCS). Women and Birth. 30(3). 220–226. 15 indexed citations

Brady, Susannah, Fiona Bogossian, & Kristen Gibbons. (2014). The effectiveness of varied levels of simulation fidelity on integrated performance of technical skills in midwifery students — A randomised intervention trial. Nurse Education Today. 35(3). 524–529. 29 indexed citations

10.

Brady, Susannah, et al.. (2013). A protocol for evaluating progressive levels of simulation fidelity in the development of technical skills, integrated performance and woman centred clinical assessment skills in undergraduate midwifery students. BMC Medical Education. 13(1). 72–72. 17 indexed citations

11.

Neville, Christine, et al.. (2013). Team decision making: design, implementation and evaluation of an interprofessional education activity for undergraduate health science students. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 27(6). 523–525. 22 indexed citations

12.

McKenna, Lisa, Fiona Bogossian, Helen Hall, et al.. (2011). Is simulation a substitute for real life clinical experience in midwifery? A qualitative examination of perceptions of educational leaders. Nurse Education Today. 31(7). 682–686. 34 indexed citations

13.

Cooper, Simon, Robyn Cant, Jo Porter, et al.. (2011). Simulation based learning in midwifery education: A systematic review. Women and Birth. 25(2). 64–78. 130 indexed citations

14.

Fox‐Young, Stephanie, Susannah Brady, Simon Cooper, et al.. (2011). The perspectives of Australian midwifery academics on barriers and enablers for simulation in midwifery education in Australia: A focus group study. Midwifery. 28(4). 495–501. 14 indexed citations

15.

Bogossian, Fiona, et al.. (2011). Simulation based learning in Australian midwifery curricula: Results of a national electronic survey. Women and Birth. 25(2). 86–97. 23 indexed citations

16.

Bogossian, Fiona, et al.. (2010). Simulated learning environments: midwifery curriculum. Final report. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 1–46. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact