Susan Stoney

1.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
33 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Susan Stoney is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Susan Stoney has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 6 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Susan Stoney's work include Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (8 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (5 papers). Susan Stoney is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (8 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (5 papers). Susan Stoney collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Switzerland. Susan Stoney's co-authors include Hiroshi Asanuma, William Thompson, Charles Abzug, V. B. Brooks, G.S. Sohal, Rory Lewis, Jan Herrington, Anthony Herrington, Ron Oliver and L. D. Gugino and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Journal of Neurophysiology and Brain Research.

In The Last Decade

Susan Stoney

30 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Excitation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical microstimulation: effective extent of stimulating current.

1968 537 citations Susan Stoney, Hiroshi Asanuma et al. Journal of Neurophysiology profile →

Peers

Susan Stoney

CN

CMN

NEURO

BE

NEURO

Thomas C. Harrison United States

Suzanne S. Stensaas United States

Velicia Bachtiar United Kingdom

Corette J. Wierenga Netherlands

Jacob Wienecke Denmark

Karen Manning United States

Anna Dunaevsky United States

Ann Jervie Sefton Australia

Jean‐Paul Joseph France

Bernhard Spitzer Germany

Thomas C. Harrison United States

Susan Stoney

654 ×1.0

CN

663 ×1.1

CMN

149 ×0.5

NEURO

85 ×0.5

BE

45 ×0.4

NEURO

Citations per year, relative to Susan Stoney Susan Stoney (= 1×) peers Thomas C. Harrison

Countries citing papers authored by Susan Stoney

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Susan Stoney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan Stoney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan Stoney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Susan Stoney

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan Stoney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan Stoney. The network helps show where Susan Stoney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susan Stoney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susan Stoney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susan Stoney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Susan Stoney. Susan Stoney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Drew, Steve, et al.. (2016). Formative observation of teaching: focusing peer assistance on teachers’ developmental goals. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 42(6). 914–929. 17 indexed citations

2.

Carbone, Angela, et al.. (2013). A peer assisted teaching scheme. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations

3.

Stockdale, Rosemary & Susan Stoney. (2006). Developing a Positive Experience of Introductory Information Systems for Women at two Australasian Universities. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine.

4.

Stockdale, Rosemary, Chad Lin, & Susan Stoney. (2005). The Effectiveness of SME Websites in a Business To Business Context. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 259–266. 4 indexed citations

5.

Stoney, Susan, et al.. (2003). The problems of jurisdiction to e‐commerce – some suggested strategies. Logistics Information Management. 16(1). 74–80. 1 indexed citations

6.

Stoney, Susan, et al.. (2001). Designing for diversity. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 2 indexed citations

7.

Herrington, Anthony, et al.. (2001). Quality guidelines for online courses: The development of an instrument to audit online units. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 40 indexed citations

8.

Herrington, Jan, et al.. (1997). Developing interactive multimedia programs for higher education. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University). 1 indexed citations

9.

Stoney, Susan & Jan Herrington. (1997). The page in print: Designing better documents with desktop publishing. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University). 1 indexed citations

10.

Nosek, Thomas M., G. C. Bond, Robert E. Godt, et al.. (1993). Using Computer‐Aided Instruction (CAI) to Promote Active Learning in the Physiology Classroom. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 701(1). 128–129. 3 indexed citations

11.

Doetsch, Gernot S., et al.. (1992). Convergent inputs to single neurons in two different subdivisions of somatosensory forepaw digit cortex of the raccoon. Experimental Neurology. 115(2). 250–259. 5 indexed citations

12.

Sohal, G.S., et al.. (1991). Influence of grafting a smaller target muscle on the magnitude of naturally occurring trochlear motor neuron death during development. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 304(2). 187–197. 9 indexed citations

13.

Gugino, L. D., et al.. (1990). Raccoon forelimb motorsensory cortex: I. Somatic afferent inputs to different cytoarchitectonic areas. Brain Research Bulletin. 24(6). 819–825. 4 indexed citations

14.

Gugino, L. D., et al.. (1990). Raccoon forelimb motorsensory cortex: II. Somatosensory inputs to single neurons. Brain Research Bulletin. 24(6). 827–832. 2 indexed citations

15.

Gugino, L. D., et al.. (1990). Motor outflow to cervical motoneurons from raccoon motorsensory cortex. Brain Research Bulletin. 24(6). 833–837. 13 indexed citations

16.

Stoney, Susan. (1990). Limitations on impulse conduction at the branch point of afferent axons in frog dorsal root ganglion. Experimental Brain Research. 80(3). 512–524. 52 indexed citations

17.

Stoney, Susan. (1985). Unequal branch point filtering action in different types of dorsal root ganglion neurons of frogs. Neuroscience Letters. 59(1). 15–20. 23 indexed citations

18.

Stoney, Susan & G.S. Sohal. (1978). Development of the trochlear nerve: Neuromuscular transmission and electrophysiologic properties. Experimental Neurology. 62(3). 798–803. 12 indexed citations

19.

Stoney, Susan & Xenia Machne. (1969). Mechanisms of Accommodation in Different Types of Frog Neurons. The Journal of General Physiology. 53(2). 248–262. 12 indexed citations

20.

Asanuma, Hiroshi, Susan Stoney, & Charles Abzug. (1968). Relationship between afferent input and motor outflow in cat motorsensory cortex.. Journal of Neurophysiology. 31(5). 670–681. 202 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact