Susan M. Ascher
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 0.2%
- Reproductive Medicine top 0.2%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 1%
- Surgery top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Richard C. SemelkaJames B. SpiesIzumi ImaokaCaroline ReinholdReena JhaRichard H. PattJeffrey J. BrownA S Bagley
- Topics
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments (28 papers)Endometriosis Research and Treatment (25 papers)Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (23 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaJapan
In The Last Decade
Susan M. Ascher
94 papers receiving 4.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 1.7k
- Reproductive Medicine 1.5k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.1k
- Surgery 1.0k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 551
Countries citing papers authored by Susan M. Ascher
This map shows the geographic impact of Susan M. Ascher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan M. Ascher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan M. Ascher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Susan M. Ascher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan M. Ascher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan M. Ascher. The network helps show where Susan M. Ascher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susan M. Ascher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susan M. Ascher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susan M. Ascher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Susan M. Ascher. Susan M. Ascher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 35 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 288 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 59 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | Hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery : imaging strategies and surgical decision making | 1 |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 48 | |
| 17 | 65 | |
| 18 | 198 | |
| 19 | 235 | |
| 20 | 30 |
About Susan M. Ascher
Susan M. Ascher is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Hepatology, having authored 95 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (28 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (25 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (1.7k citations), Reproductive Medicine (1.5k citations) and Hepatology (405 citations). Susan M. Ascher has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Richard C. Semelka, James B. Spies, Izumi Imaoka, Caroline Reinhold, Reena Jha, Richard H. Patt, Jeffrey J. Brown, A S Bagley, R K Zeman and Nikolaos Kelekis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute and Radiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.