Reena Jha

3.0k citations
49 papers · 1.7k indexed · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

    • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 10
    • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis 13
    • Liver Disease and Transplantation 4

Reena Jha

47 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Reena Jha
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 684
  • Reproductive Medicine 577
  • Hepatology 406
  • Oncology 343
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 231
Replace Benedetta Gui with:
Benedetta Gui Italy
Izumi Imaoka Japan
Carin F. Gonsalves United States
Paniti Sukumvanich United States
Jean‐Marc Classe France
Chong‐Jong Wang Taiwan
Scott D. Richard United States
Karolina Sikorska Netherlands
A Gerbaulet France
Lionel Arrivé France
Reena Jha relative to Benedetta Gui Italy Benedetta Gui's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Benedetta Gui · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Reena Jha

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reena Jha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reena Jha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reena Jha more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Reena Jha

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reena Jha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reena Jha. The network helps show where Reena Jha may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Reena Jha, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Reena Jha Line = papers co-authored together Reena Jha links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017220
2 2004151
3 2002104
4 200593
5 201383
6 201779
7 200368
8 201466
9 199963
10 200557
11 200652
12 201146
13 201846
14 201535
15 200034
16 200334
17 199933
18 201431
19 201028
20 201427

About Reena Jha

Reena Jha is a scholar working on Oncology, Hepatology, Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (13 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (12 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (11 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (10 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (6 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (4 papers) and Liver Disease and Transplantation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (684 citations), Reproductive Medicine (577 citations), Hepatology (406 citations), Oncology (343 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (231 citations). Reena Jha has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Nepal and Japan. Frequent co-authors include James B. Spies, Susan M. Ascher, Pamela Flick, Sandra J. Allison, Jean‐Pierre Pelage, Elliot Levy, Junko Takahama, Claude B. Sirlin, Donald G. Mitchell and Cirrelda Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Roentgenology, Radiology, The American Journal of Surgery, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology and Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact