Scott Goodwin

6.5k citations
91 papers · 3.5k indexed · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Goodwin

87 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Scott Goodwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 2.3k
  • Reproductive Medicine 1.9k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 730
  • Internal Medicine 69
  • Biomaterials 214
Replace Jean‐Pierre Pelage with:
Jean‐Pierre Pelage France
Elizabeth A. Sadowski United States
Jack Baniel Israel
Roberto Angioli Italy
Ofer Lavie Israel
Alexandre Laurent France
Robert Giuntoli United States
Lan Zhu China
U. Haller Switzerland
David Guthrie United Kingdom
Scott Goodwin relative to Jean‐Pierre Pelage France Jean‐Pierre Pelage's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.6×
Jean‐Pierre Pelage · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Goodwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Goodwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Goodwin. The network helps show where Scott Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Goodwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Goodwin Line = papers co-authored together Scott Goodwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Chemotherapy-related complications in the kidneys and collecting system: an imaging perspective
20151
2 201556
3 201530
4 20114
5 20064
6 20059
7 2005108
8 200543
9 2005145
10 200368
11 200211
12 200216
13 200230
14 2001124
15 200125
16 200122
17 200041
18 200028
19
Uterine artery embolization for fibroids: considerations in patient selection and clinical follow-up.
19995
20 199994

About Scott Goodwin

Scott Goodwin is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Internal Medicine, Hepatology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 91 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (50 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (35 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (24 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (7 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (5 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (4 papers), Vascular Procedures and Complications (4 papers) and Peripheral Artery Disease Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (2.3k citations), Reproductive Medicine (1.9k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (730 citations), Internal Medicine (69 citations) and Biomaterials (214 citations). Scott Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Bruce McLucas, Suresh Vedantham, James B. Spies, R R Perrella, Robert L. Worthington-Kirsch, Gregory Mohr, Evan R. Myers, Woodruff J. Walker, Carl K. Hoh and Gaylene Pron. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey and Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026