Susan D. Hosek
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 13
- Global Health Care Issues 8
- Health and Conflict Studies 6
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 3
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Healthcare Policy and Management 22
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 3
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Diversity and Career in Medicine 4
- Occupational Therapy top 10%
-
- Health and Medical Research Impacts 3
- Co-authors
- Jeanne S. RingelBen VollaardGary CecchineElizabeth M. SlossM. Susan MarquisKenneth B. WellsRobert L KaneJack Zwanziger
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Susan D. Hosek
52 papers receiving 391 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- General Health Professions 222
- Economics and Econometrics 201
- Gender Studies 57
- Occupational Therapy 19
- Psychiatry and Mental health 57
Countries citing papers authored by Susan D. Hosek
This map shows the geographic impact of Susan D. Hosek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan D. Hosek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan D. Hosek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Susan D. Hosek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan D. Hosek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan D. Hosek. The network helps show where Susan D. Hosek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Susan D. Hosek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 2 | Gender Differences in Major Federal External Grant Programs. Technical Report Summary. | 2005 | 1 |
| 3 | Is There Gender Bias in Federal Grant Programs? Research Brief. | 2005 | 2 |
| 4 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 25 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 23 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 15 | |
| 11 | The Demand for Military Health Care | 1995 | 2 |
| 12 | 1992 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1990 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1987 | 3 | |
| 18 | Charges and Outcomes for Rehabilitative Care | 1986 | 6 |
| 19 | Health Care in the Military. Feasibility and Desirability of a Health Enrollment System | 1984 | 2 |
| 20 | 1981 | 5 |
About Susan D. Hosek
Susan D. Hosek is a scholar working on Chemical Health and Safety, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 59 papers that have together received 458 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (22 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (13 papers), Global Health Care Issues (8 papers), Health and Conflict Studies (6 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (4 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (222 citations), Economics and Econometrics (201 citations) and Gender Studies (57 citations). Susan D. Hosek has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Jeanne S. Ringel, Ben Vollaard, Gary Cecchine, Elizabeth M. Sloss, M. Susan Marquis, Kenneth B. Wells, Robert L Kane, Jack Zwanziger, Richard L. Kravitz and Maureen F. Carney. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Care, Health Affairs and Annals of Emergency Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.