Susan Bonzi
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 1%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Information Systems top 10%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Co-authors
- Herbert SnyderElizabeth D. LiddyJeffrey KatzerDonald DayDerek L. HansenLori KendallDavid W. McDonald
- Topics
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research (4 papers)Academic Writing and Publishing (3 papers)linguistics and terminology studies (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Statistics, Probability and UncertaintyHistory and Philosophy of ScienceInformation Systems
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Susan Bonzi
12 papers receiving 336 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 225
- Artificial Intelligence 113
- Information Systems 85
- History and Philosophy of Science 67
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 28
Countries citing papers authored by Susan Bonzi
This map shows the geographic impact of Susan Bonzi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan Bonzi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan Bonzi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Susan Bonzi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan Bonzi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan Bonzi. The network helps show where Susan Bonzi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susan Bonzi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susan Bonzi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susan Bonzi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Susan Bonzi. Susan Bonzi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | iSchools and Undergraduate Education | 1 |
| 2 | 117 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | Senior faculty perceptions of research productivity | 2 |
| 5 | Faculty Productivity as a Function of Cohort Group, Discipline, and Academic Age. | 3 |
| 6 | 117 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 65 |
About Susan Bonzi
Susan Bonzi is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Language and Linguistics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (4 papers), Academic Writing and Publishing (3 papers) and linguistics and terminology studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (225 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (67 citations) and Information Systems (85 citations). Susan Bonzi has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Herbert Snyder, Elizabeth D. Liddy, Jeffrey Katzer, Donald Day, Derek L. Hansen, Lori Kendall and David W. McDonald. Their work appears in journals such as Scientometrics, Information Processing & Management and Journal of Documentation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.