Fiona Ulph
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Family and Disability Support Research 6
-
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics 13
- Genetics top 10%
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer 12
- Genomics and Rare Diseases 9
- Clinical Biochemistry top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 6
-
- Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances 11
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 10
-
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 7
Fiona Ulph
63 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Clinical Psychology 343
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 302
- Genetics 272
- Clinical Biochemistry 53
- General Health Professions 192
Countries citing papers authored by Fiona Ulph
This map shows the geographic impact of Fiona Ulph's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiona Ulph with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiona Ulph more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fiona Ulph
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fiona Ulph. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fiona Ulph. The network helps show where Fiona Ulph may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fiona Ulph, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 51 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 40 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 18 | The impact on parents of receiving a carrier result for sickle cell or cystic fibrosis for their child via newborn screening | 2014 | 9 |
| 19 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 12 |
About Fiona Ulph
Fiona Ulph is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology, Genetics, General Health Professions and Genetics, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (13 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (12 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (11 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (10 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (9 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (7 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (6 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (343 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (302 citations), Genetics (272 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (53 citations) and General Health Professions (192 citations). Fiona Ulph has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Calam, Nadeem Qureshi, Joe Kai, Tim Cullinan, Sarah Peters, Aala El‐Khani, Daniel Pratt, Yvonne Awenat, Patricia Gooding and Kevin W Southern. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Human Genetics, BMJ Open, British Journal of Health Psychology, BMC Cancer and Health Technology Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.