Stuart Mercer

1.7k total citations
33 papers, 535 citations indexed

About

Stuart Mercer is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stuart Mercer has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 535 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Surgery, 18 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 11 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Stuart Mercer's work include Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (7 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (6 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers). Stuart Mercer is often cited by papers focused on Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (7 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (6 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers). Stuart Mercer collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and France. Stuart Mercer's co-authors include Federica Di Nicolantonio, Ian A. Cree, Pauline A. Whitehouse, Louise A. Knight, Sanjay Sharma, Simon Toh, Shaw Somers, Sharon Glaysher, Penny Johnson and Alan Lamont and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Gastroenterology and Annals of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Stuart Mercer

32 papers receiving 520 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stuart Mercer United Kingdom 13 232 215 196 141 51 33 535
Brian Shrager United States 8 165 0.7× 159 0.7× 339 1.7× 112 0.8× 213 4.2× 11 904
Juergen Tepel Germany 12 130 0.6× 149 0.7× 211 1.1× 193 1.4× 25 0.5× 20 529
Ken Saijo Japan 12 232 1.0× 133 0.6× 92 0.5× 203 1.4× 52 1.0× 47 530
Amélie Deleporte Belgium 13 277 1.2× 117 0.5× 150 0.8× 52 0.4× 48 0.9× 32 486
Julliëtte E M van Eerd Netherlands 10 168 0.7× 107 0.5× 81 0.4× 113 0.8× 34 0.7× 13 501
S. Romito Italy 12 645 2.8× 330 1.5× 153 0.8× 121 0.9× 74 1.5× 23 871
Wen Gao China 13 225 1.0× 186 0.9× 162 0.8× 187 1.3× 47 0.9× 51 717
Gary Frenette United States 10 399 1.7× 235 1.1× 242 1.2× 238 1.7× 52 1.0× 16 723
Jean Torrisi United States 7 122 0.5× 91 0.4× 67 0.3× 72 0.5× 29 0.6× 11 307
Steven S. Evans United States 10 163 0.7× 62 0.3× 113 0.6× 61 0.4× 59 1.2× 21 343

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Mercer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Mercer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Mercer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Mercer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Mercer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Mercer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Mercer. The network helps show where Stuart Mercer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart Mercer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart Mercer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart Mercer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart Mercer. Stuart Mercer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pucher, Philip H., Nicholas C. Carter, John A. Conti, et al.. (2025). Robotic emergency general surgery, future or fallacy?: case-matched comparison of operative and clinical outcomes during the adoption phase in a tertiary centre. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 19(1). 657–657.
2.
Rahman, Saqib, et al.. (2023). Comparison of major abdominal emergency surgery outcomes across organizational models of emergency surgical care: Analysis of the UK NELA national database. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 96(2). 305–312. 2 indexed citations
3.
Straatman, Jennifer, et al.. (2023). Systematic review: robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic multiport cholecystectomy. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 17(5). 1967–1977. 14 indexed citations
4.
Straatman, Jennifer, Saqib Rahman, Nicholas C. Carter, et al.. (2023). Proctored adoption of robotic hiatus hernia surgery: outcomes and learning curves in a high-volume UK centre. Surgical Endoscopy. 37(10). 7608–7615. 10 indexed citations
5.
Rahman, Saqib, et al.. (2023). Laparoscopy in high-risk emergency general surgery reduces intensive care stay, length of stay and mortality. Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery. 408(1). 62–62. 6 indexed citations
6.
Beable, Richard, Nicholas C. Carter, Benjamin Knight, et al.. (2023). Intra-operative ultrasound assessment of the biliary tree during robotic cholecystectomy. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 17(6). 2611–2615. 5 indexed citations
7.
Mercer, Stuart, et al.. (2023). Trends in emergency colorectal surgery: a 7-year retrospective single-centre cohort study. Surgical Endoscopy. 37(5). 3911–3920. 4 indexed citations
8.
9.
Ball, Chris, et al.. (2022). Emergency robotic colorectal surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective case series study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(2). 57–60. 11 indexed citations
10.
11.
Khan, Omar, et al.. (2012). Open and laparoscopically assisted oesophagectomy: a prospective comparative study†. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 43(2). 268–273. 26 indexed citations
12.
Mercer, Stuart, et al.. (2011). Indirect Colonic Injury After Military Wounding: A Case Series. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 71(5). 1475–1477. 12 indexed citations
13.
Mercer, Stuart, Sukhpal Singh, & Iain Paterson. (2007). Selective MRCP in the management of suspected common bile duct stones. HPB. 9(2). 125–130. 17 indexed citations
14.
Knight, Louise A., Federica Di Nicolantonio, Pauline A. Whitehouse, et al.. (2006). The effect of imatinib mesylate (Glivec) on human tumor-derived cells. Anti-Cancer Drugs. 17(6). 649–655. 13 indexed citations
15.
Mercer, Stuart, Federica Di Nicolantonio, Louise A. Knight, et al.. (2005). Rapid up-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 by 5-fluorouracil in human solid tumors. Anti-Cancer Drugs. 16(5). 495–500. 11 indexed citations
16.
Nicolantonio, Federica Di, Louise A. Knight, Silvana Di Palma, et al.. (2004). Ex vivo characterization of XR11576 (MLN576) against ovarian cancer and other solid tumors. Anti-Cancer Drugs. 15(9). 849–860. 7 indexed citations
17.
Mercer, Stuart, Shaw Somers, Louise A. Knight, et al.. (2003). Heterogeneity of chemosensitivity of esophageal and gastric carcinoma. Anti-Cancer Drugs. 14(6). 397–403. 19 indexed citations
18.
Sharma, Sanjay, Michael H. Neale, Federica Di Nicolantonio, et al.. (2003). Outcome of ATP-based tumor chemosensitivity assay directed chemotherapy in heavily pre-treated recurrent ovarian carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 3(1). 19–19. 56 indexed citations
19.
Whitehouse, Pauline A., Louise A. Knight, Federica Di Nicolantonio, et al.. (2003). Heterogeneity of chemosensitivity of colorectal adenocarcinoma determined by a modified ex vivo ATP-tumor chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA). Anti-Cancer Drugs. 14(5). 369–375. 31 indexed citations
20.
Mercer, Stuart, et al.. (2001). Arup : Hong Kong station. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Brian Shrager Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Juergen Tepel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ken Saijo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Amélie Deleporte Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Julliëtte E M van Eerd Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. Romito Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Wen Gao Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gary Frenette Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jean Torrisi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Steven S. Evans
Rankless by CCL
2026