Jim Khan

5.3k total citations
121 papers, 952 citations indexed

About

Jim Khan is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Jim Khan has authored 121 papers receiving a total of 952 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 95 papers in Oncology, 88 papers in Surgery and 22 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Jim Khan's work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (90 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (39 papers) and Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (25 papers). Jim Khan is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (90 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (39 papers) and Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (25 papers). Jim Khan collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and France. Jim Khan's co-authors include Amjad Parvaiz, Karen Flashman, Valerio Celentano, Jamil Ahmed, Manish Chand, Danilo Mišković, Najaf Siddiqi, Richard Cohen, Laurence Devoto and D P O'Leary and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

In The Last Decade

Jim Khan

109 papers receiving 937 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jim Khan United Kingdom 17 718 657 212 132 76 121 952
Karen Flashman United Kingdom 16 554 0.8× 396 0.6× 166 0.8× 81 0.6× 33 0.4× 39 712
Seth Felder United States 17 426 0.6× 462 0.7× 207 1.0× 145 1.1× 35 0.5× 67 898
Bilgi Baca Türkiye 19 490 0.7× 693 1.1× 280 1.3× 60 0.5× 34 0.4× 91 911
Deena Harji United Kingdom 16 502 0.7× 612 0.9× 127 0.6× 102 0.8× 38 0.5× 71 788
Peadar S. Waters Australia 14 340 0.5× 499 0.8× 139 0.7× 60 0.5× 33 0.4× 79 745
Muhammed Siddiqui United Kingdom 14 336 0.5× 608 0.9× 133 0.6× 71 0.5× 22 0.3× 24 870
Brad Champagne United States 15 492 0.7× 578 0.9× 173 0.8× 185 1.4× 19 0.3× 26 770
Ignasi Poves Spain 16 685 1.0× 798 1.2× 459 2.2× 87 0.7× 61 0.8× 57 1.1k
Matteo Rottoli Italy 15 467 0.7× 473 0.7× 162 0.8× 36 0.3× 28 0.4× 65 778
A. Valverde France 15 578 0.8× 831 1.3× 385 1.8× 29 0.2× 24 0.3× 63 973

Countries citing papers authored by Jim Khan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jim Khan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jim Khan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jim Khan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jim Khan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jim Khan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jim Khan. The network helps show where Jim Khan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jim Khan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jim Khan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jim Khan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jim Khan. Jim Khan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mohamedahmed, Ali Yasen, et al.. (2025). Left colectomy for diverticular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing robotic and laparoscopic resections. Techniques in Coloproctology. 29(1). 121–121.
2.
Carannante, Filippo, et al.. (2025). Splenic flexure resection with Hugo™ RAS : Trocar placement, docking settings, and surgical strategy. Colorectal Disease. 27(9). e70242–e70242.
3.
Duhoky, Rauand, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Thijs A. Burghgraef, et al.. (2025). Ten years of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer (short-term RESOLUTION). JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 117(8). 1614–1626. 1 indexed citations
4.
Pucher, Philip H., Nicholas C. Carter, John A. Conti, et al.. (2025). Robotic emergency general surgery, future or fallacy?: case-matched comparison of operative and clinical outcomes during the adoption phase in a tertiary centre. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 19(1). 657–657.
5.
Boal, Matthew, Rauand Duhoky, Tania Gill, et al.. (2025). Association of skill and errors with outcomes in robotic rectal cancer surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. 40(3). 2085–2094.
7.
Duhoky, Rauand, Thijs A. Burghgraef, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, et al.. (2025). Analysis of Local Recurrence After Robotic-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision (ALRITE): An International, Multicentre, Retrospective Cohort. Cancers. 17(6). 992–992. 2 indexed citations
8.
Carannante, Filippo, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Gianfranco Bianco, et al.. (2024). Quadruple Assessment of Colorectal Anastomosis after Laparoscopic Rectal Resection: A Retrospective Analysis of a Propensity-Matched Cohort. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 13(17). 5092–5092. 4 indexed citations
9.
Boal, Matthew, et al.. (2024). Development and evaluation of a societal core robotic surgery accreditation curriculum for the UK. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 18(1). 305–305. 7 indexed citations
10.
Piozzi, Guglielmo Niccolò, et al.. (2024). Laparoscopic versus Open Emergency Surgery for Right Colon Cancers. Diagnostics. 14(4). 407–407. 1 indexed citations
11.
de’Angelis, Nicola, Carlo Alberto Schena, Danila Azzolina, et al.. (2024). Histopathological outcomes of transanal, robotic, open, and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer resection. A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 51(1). 109481–109481. 5 indexed citations
12.
Piozzi, Guglielmo Niccolò, et al.. (2024). Robotic surgery for bowel endometriosis: a multidisciplinary management of a complex entity. Techniques in Coloproctology. 28(1). 31–31.
13.
Chaouch, Mohamed Ali, et al.. (2024). Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing robotic total mesorectal excision versus transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. 114(1). 73–83. 3 indexed citations
14.
Tsimogiannis, Konstantinos, et al.. (2023). Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer: A Feasibility Study from a European Centre. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 13(1). 90–90. 6 indexed citations
15.
Charter, Richard A., Americo Cicchetti, Richard Culbertson, et al.. (2023). Best practice considerations on the assessment of robotic assisted surgical systems: results from an international consensus expert panel. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 39(1). e39–e39. 7 indexed citations
16.
Harji, Deena, Josh Burke, B Griffiths, et al.. (2022). The current status of robotic colorectal surgery training programmes. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 17(2). 251–263. 20 indexed citations
19.
Banerjee, Anjan K., Gaius Longcroft‐Wheaton, Richard Beable, et al.. (2018). The role of imaging and biopsy in the management and staging of large non-pedunculated rectal polyps. Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 12(8). 749–755. 2 indexed citations
20.
Khan, Omar, et al.. (2013). The impact of the specialist colorectal surgeons in management of emergency right colon cancer. International Journal of Surgery. 11(8). 701–701. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026