Stuart Hooton

647 total citations
9 papers, 508 citations indexed

About

Stuart Hooton is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Stuart Hooton has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 508 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 4 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 2 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Stuart Hooton's work include Radiology practices and education (5 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (2 papers) and Radiation Dose and Imaging (2 papers). Stuart Hooton is often cited by papers focused on Radiology practices and education (5 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (2 papers) and Radiation Dose and Imaging (2 papers). Stuart Hooton collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Stuart Hooton's co-authors include Philip F. Judy, Ron Kikinis, Richard D. Nawfel, Stuart G. Silverman, Kemal Tuncali, Douglass F. Adams, Ramin Khorasani, Philip E. Stieg, Richard B. Schwartz and D M Chernoff and has published in prestigious journals such as Radiology, American Journal of Roentgenology and Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics.

In The Last Decade

Stuart Hooton

9 papers receiving 485 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Stuart Hooton United States	7	272	258	127	94	88	9	508
Koenraad Nieboer Belgium	14	155 0.6×	243 0.9×	119 0.9×	115 1.2×	98 1.1×	40	548
P L Molina United States	13	255 0.9×	234 0.9×	90 0.7×	53 0.6×	131 1.5×	16	528
Stephan Altmayer Brazil	15	312 1.1×	285 1.1×	57 0.4×	70 0.7×	98 1.1×	75	658
Bernhard Baumert Switzerland	10	165 0.6×	310 1.2×	110 0.9×	123 1.3×	202 2.3×	15	547
Jan Bosmans Belgium	8	138 0.5×	367 1.4×	64 0.5×	154 1.6×	101 1.1×	21	606
Craig B. Glaiberman United States	10	125 0.5×	205 0.8×	124 1.0×	34 0.4×	193 2.2×	25	482
Prashant Nagpal United States	18	393 1.4×	281 1.1×	100 0.8×	142 1.5×	313 3.6×	92	921
John C. Wandtke United States	14	353 1.3×	171 0.7×	52 0.4×	52 0.6×	92 1.0×	49	527
Thomas Weikert Switzerland	16	173 0.6×	427 1.7×	144 1.1×	154 1.6×	83 0.9×	38	759
Jens J. Froelich Germany	12	233 0.9×	99 0.4×	42 0.3×	37 0.4×	174 2.0×	39	467

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Hooton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Hooton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Hooton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Hooton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Hooton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Hooton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Hooton. The network helps show where Stuart Hooton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart Hooton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart Hooton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart Hooton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart Hooton. Stuart Hooton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Lacson, Ronilda, et al.. (2022). A Comparison of Two Scheduling Models for Prompt Resolution of Diagnostic Imaging Orders. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 20(2). 218–221. 1 indexed citations

Lacson, Ronilda, Mick Healey, Stuart Hooton, et al.. (2020). Closing the Loop on Unscheduled Diagnostic Imaging Orders: A Systems-Based Approach. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 18(1). 60–67. 5 indexed citations

Glazer, Daniel I., et al.. (2019). Technologist Productivity and Accuracy in Assigning Protocols for Abdominal CT and MRI Examinations at an Academic Medical Center: Implications for Physician Workload. American Journal of Roentgenology. 213(5). 1003–1007. 6 indexed citations

Nawfel, Richard D., Philip F. Judy, Stuart G. Silverman, et al.. (2000). Patient and Personnel Exposure during CT Fluoroscopy-guided Interventional Procedures. Radiology. 216(1). 180–184. 154 indexed citations

Tello, Richard, et al.. (1998). Value of spiral CT in hemodynamically stable patients following blunt chest trauma. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics. 22(6). 447–452. 10 indexed citations

Seltzer, Steven E., Pauline Kelly, D F Adams, et al.. (1997). Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports in a teaching hospital setting.. American Journal of Roentgenology. 168(4). 889–893. 38 indexed citations

Seltzer, Steven E., Philip F. Judy, D F Adams, et al.. (1995). Spiral CT of the chest: comparison of cine and film-based viewing.. Radiology. 197(1). 73–78. 88 indexed citations

Schwartz, Richard B., Kimberly Marie Jones, D M Chernoff, et al.. (1992). Common carotid artery bifurcation: evaluation with spiral CT. Work in progress.. Radiology. 185(2). 513–519. 130 indexed citations

Schwartz, Richard B., D M Chernoff, Suresh K. Mukherji, et al.. (1992). Common Carotid Artery Bifurcation: Evaluation with Spiral CT. 76 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact