Stewart McLean
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 1%
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Biological Stains and Phytochemicals
Papers in
-
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 34
-
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids 18
- Co-authors
- William F. Reynolds (102 shared papers)Winston F. Tinto (57 shared papers)Helen Jacobs (31 shared papers)Peter D. Haynes (6 shared papers)Raúl G. Enríquez (7 shared papers)David G. Murray (8 shared papers)Margaret K. Yu (12 shared papers)Geneive E. Henry (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Canadian Journal of Chemistry (47 papers)Journal of Natural Products (40 papers)Tetrahedron Letters (27 papers)Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry (15 papers)Tetrahedron (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaBarbadosTrinidad and Tobago
In The Last Decade
Stewart McLean
170 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Biochemistry 354
- Pharmacology 350
- Biotechnology 326
- Organic Chemistry 952
- Pharmacology 558
Countries citing papers authored by Stewart McLean
This map shows the geographic impact of Stewart McLean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stewart McLean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stewart McLean more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stewart McLean
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stewart McLean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stewart McLean. The network helps show where Stewart McLean may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stewart McLean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 177 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1986 | 138 | |
| 2 | 1989 | 109 | |
| 3 | 1992 | 86 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 79 | |
| 5 | 1965 | 75 | |
| 6 | 1965 | 69 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 62 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 58 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 56 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 52 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 51 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 47 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 43 | |
| 14 | 1998 | 41 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 40 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 40 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 40 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 39 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 38 | |
| 20 | 1969 | 38 |
About Stewart McLean
Stewart McLean is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Biochemistry, Plant Science and Pharmacology, having authored 177 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (34 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (34 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (24 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (22 papers), Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology (21 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (18 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (16 papers) and Biological Stains and Phytochemicals (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (354 citations), Pharmacology (350 citations), Biotechnology (326 citations), Organic Chemistry (952 citations) and Pharmacology (558 citations). Stewart McLean has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Barbados and Trinidad and Tobago. Frequent co-authors include William F. Reynolds, Winston F. Tinto, Helen Jacobs, Peter D. Haynes, Raúl G. Enríquez, David G. Murray, Margaret K. Yu, Geneive E. Henry, Baldwin S. Mootoo and Wilfred R. Chan. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Chemistry, Journal of Natural Products, Tetrahedron Letters, Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry and Tetrahedron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.