Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Antimicrobial properties of plant essential oils and essences against five important food-borne pathogens
This map shows the geographic impact of Stewart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stewart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stewart more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stewart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stewart. The network helps show where Stewart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stewart
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stewart.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stewart based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stewart. Stewart is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
, Simon, et al.. (2016). Gender and tachycardia： independent modulation of platelet reactivity in patients with atrial fibrillation. 老年心脏病学杂志：英文版. 13(3). 202–208.1 indexed citations
5.
Khan, Javed, et al.. (2016). Comparative Genomic Analysis of NF1-Associated Atypical Neurofibromas (ANF) and Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors (MPNST). 25–25.1 indexed citations
6.
Chang, et al.. (2014). Mechanism of immunomodulatory drugs＇ action in the treatment of multiple myeloma. 生物化学与生物物理学报：英文版. 240–253.27 indexed citations
7.
Stewart, Andrew andrew, John K. John, et al.. (2010). SLC11A1 polymorphisms in inflammatory bowel disease and Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis status. 世界胃肠病学杂志：英文版（电子版）. 5727–5731.1 indexed citations
8.
Sharma, Umesh, Stewart, & Alan Lowe. (2010). Institutional Contradiction and Management Control Innovation: A Field Study of Total Quality Management Practices in a Privatized Telecommunication Company. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
9.
Stewart, et al.. (2010). The Place of Corporate Lawmaking in American Society. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
10.
Stewart, et al.. (2000). Patterns of drinking and drinking outcomes among drug misusers 1-year follow-up results.. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment.3 indexed citations
Stewart. (1990). Treatment planning for the overdenture.. PubMed. 37(5). 397–401.1 indexed citations
15.
Stewart, et al.. (1989). Pharmacokinetics of superoxide dismutase during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass.. PubMed. 80(5 Pt 2). III25–9.
16.
Stewart, et al.. (1989). The physical effects of lightning injury.. PubMed. 29(3). 267–72.52 indexed citations
17.
Stewart, et al.. (1987). Nutritional concerns for patients with Alzheimer's disease.. PubMed. 83(1). 40–3.3 indexed citations
18.
Stewart, et al.. (1979). The effect of body motion on convective heat transfer from a nude man. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. 79(16). 485–488.8 indexed citations
19.
Stewart, et al.. (1974). Electrocardiography of the horse and potential performance ability. 45(4). 263–268.19 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.