Steven Smith
- Molecular Biology
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Hematology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jonathan M. GoodmanMing‐Ming ZhouGuangtao ZhangRoberto SánchezRobert S. PatonJonathan W. BurtonDennis J. MeyerPeter Armstrong
- Topics
- Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (4 papers)Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (4 papers)Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers)
- Cited by
- SpectroscopyHematologyPharmacology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Steven Smith
19 papers receiving 817 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Molecular Biology 443
- Organic Chemistry 215
- Spectroscopy 189
- Pharmacology 138
- Hematology 127
Countries citing papers authored by Steven Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steven Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven Smith. The network helps show where Steven Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven Smith. Steven Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | A Cooperative Multi-Agency Reef Fish Monitoring Protocol for the Florida Keys Coral Reef Ecosystem | 10 |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 51 | |
| 9 | 87 | |
| 10 | 88 | |
| 11 | 61 | |
| 12 | The influence of PSA-RNA yield on the analysis of expressed prostatic secretions (EPS) for prostate cancer diagnosis. | 4 |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 237 | |
| 16 | 73 | |
| 17 | 96 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 35 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About Steven Smith
Steven Smith is a scholar working on Hematology, Spectroscopy and Virology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 843 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (4 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (4 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (189 citations), Hematology (127 citations) and Pharmacology (138 citations). Steven Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan M. Goodman, Ming‐Ming Zhou, Guangtao Zhang, Roberto Sánchez, Robert S. Paton, Jonathan W. Burton, Dennis J. Meyer, Peter Armstrong, Catriona M. MacPhail and Michael R. Lappin. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Reviews, Journal of Clinical Oncology and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.