Steven S. Fu

108 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers

Steven S. Fu
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Physiology 1.4k
  • Applied Psychology 170
  • General Health Professions 834
  • Clinical Psychology 476
  • Health 159
Replace Isabel Cristina Scarinci with:
Isabel Cristina Scarinci United States
Sharon Lawn Australia
Kolawole Stephen Okuyemi United States
Steve Parrott United Kingdom
Ludmila M. Cofta-Woerpel United States
Janice Y. Tsoh United States
Ritesh Mistry United States
Deborah Jane Hennrikus United States
Rashid S. Njai United States
Alexander V. Prokhorov United States
Steven S. Fu relative to Isabel Cristina Scarinci United States Isabel Cristina Scarinci's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Isabel Cristina Scarinci · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steven S. Fu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven S. Fu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven S. Fu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven S. Fu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven S. Fu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven S. Fu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven S. Fu. The network helps show where Steven S. Fu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steven S. Fu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steven S. Fu Line = papers co-authored together Steven S. Fu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003504
2
Integration of mental health/substance abuse and primary care.
2008290
3 2004261
4 2011250
5 2007221
6 2008120
7 2017112
8 2006106
9 2010105
10 201599
11 200590
12 201490
13 200982
14 200970
15 200767
16 200365
17 201663
18 201461
19 200852
20 201152

About Steven S. Fu

Steven S. Fu is a scholar working on Physiology, General Health Professions, Speech and Hearing, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 112 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (68 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (6 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (6 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (1.4k citations), Applied Psychology (170 citations), General Health Professions (834 citations), Clinical Psychology (476 citations) and Health (159 citations). Steven S. Fu has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Vietnam and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Michelle van Ryn, Anne Marie Joseph, Diana J. Burgess, David B. Nelson, Barbara Ann Clothier, Rachel Widome, Robert L Kane, Scott E. Sherman, Timothy J Wilt and Hildi Hagedorn. Their work appears in journals such as Nicotine & Tobacco Research, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Preventive Medicine Reports and American Journal of Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact