Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Intussusception among Infants Given an Oral Rotavirus Vaccine
This map shows the geographic impact of David Nelson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Nelson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Nelson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Nelson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Nelson. The network helps show where David Nelson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Nelson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Nelson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Nelson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Nelson. David Nelson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hammett, Patrick, Steven S. Fu, Diana J. Burgess, et al.. (2017). Treatment barriers among younger and older socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers.. PubMed. 23(9). e295–e302.7 indexed citations
Nelson, David, et al.. (2014). Cerif4Datasets (C4D) – Utilising Semantics for the Discovery and Exploration of Datasets in Research. euroCRIS DSpace CRIS digital repository (The International Organisation for Research Information).1 indexed citations
9.
Collins, Tracie C., David Nelson, & Jasjit S. Ahluwalia. (2010). Mortality following operations for lower extremity peripheral arterial disease. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
10.
Nelson, David, et al.. (2009). Implementation of a chain ontology based approach in the health care sector. Journal of Digital Information Management. 7. 271–276.2 indexed citations
Nelson, David, et al.. (2005). Database: Enterprise, Skills and Innovation: 22nd British National Conference on Databases, BNCOD 22, Sunderland, UK, July 5-7, 2005, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). Springer eBooks.1 indexed citations
Freeman, Martin L., David Nelson, GM Eisen, et al.. (1998). Failures and complications of attempted therapeutic ERCP: Impact on outcomes and costs. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 47(4).4 indexed citations
16.
Freeman, Martin L., David Nelson, James A. DiSario, et al.. (1998). Outcomes of pancreatic therapeutic ERCP as compared with biliary therapeutic and diagnostic ERCP: A prospective multisite study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 47(4).1 indexed citations
17.
Nelson, David, et al.. (1990). Extensions of calculus. Cambridge University Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
Nelson, David, et al.. (1977). Rectal neoplasia in the dog.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 58(6). 525–8.2 indexed citations
20.
Chamberlain, Roy W., W. D. Sudia, & David Nelson. (1955). Laboratory Observations on a Mosquito, Culiseta melanura (Coquillett).. Mosquito news. 15(1).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.