Steven P. Shwartz

790 total citations
12 papers, 540 citations indexed

About

Steven P. Shwartz is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Steven P. Shwartz has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 540 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Steven P. Shwartz's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (2 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (1 paper). Steven P. Shwartz is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (2 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (1 paper). Steven P. Shwartz collaborates with scholars based in United States. Steven P. Shwartz's co-authors include Stephen M. Kosslyn, Steven Pinker, George Smith, James R. Pomerantz, Howard E. Egeth, Bert F. Green and Wendy G. Lehnert and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Memory & Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Steven P. Shwartz

12 papers receiving 495 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Steven P. Shwartz United States 7 273 153 125 107 101 12 540
Hans Buffart Netherlands 9 427 1.6× 101 0.7× 39 0.3× 96 0.9× 48 0.5× 12 602
Thomas M. Ball United States 3 388 1.4× 269 1.8× 229 1.8× 59 0.6× 156 1.5× 3 688
Adam V. Reed United States 6 410 1.5× 112 0.7× 23 0.2× 124 1.2× 163 1.6× 21 628
Shannon D. Moeser Canada 11 220 0.8× 118 0.8× 114 0.9× 193 1.8× 222 2.2× 23 548
Emanuel Leeuwenberg Netherlands 16 665 2.4× 201 1.3× 47 0.4× 91 0.9× 54 0.5× 31 873
Mark A. May Germany 10 163 0.6× 117 0.8× 292 2.3× 76 0.7× 116 1.1× 23 497
Karl F. Wender Germany 12 200 0.7× 113 0.7× 159 1.3× 75 0.7× 117 1.2× 23 510
Don R. Lyon United States 16 880 3.2× 253 1.7× 60 0.5× 54 0.5× 67 0.7× 36 1.1k
Christopher Habel Germany 12 162 0.6× 169 1.1× 165 1.3× 255 2.4× 126 1.2× 47 689
Polly K. Pook United States 7 444 1.6× 166 1.1× 27 0.2× 125 1.2× 140 1.4× 12 771

Countries citing papers authored by Steven P. Shwartz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven P. Shwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven P. Shwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven P. Shwartz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven P. Shwartz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven P. Shwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven P. Shwartz. The network helps show where Steven P. Shwartz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven P. Shwartz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven P. Shwartz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven P. Shwartz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven P. Shwartz. Steven P. Shwartz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Shwartz, Steven P., et al.. (2011). Applied Natural Language Processing. IGI Global eBooks. 28 indexed citations
2.
Lehnert, Wendy G. & Steven P. Shwartz. (1983). EXPLORER. 69–69. 4 indexed citations
3.
Shwartz, Steven P.. (1982). Problems with domain-independent natural language database access systems. 60–60. 5 indexed citations
4.
Kosslyn, Stephen M., Steven Pinker, George Smith, & Steven P. Shwartz. (1979). On the demystification of mental imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2(4). 535–548. 235 indexed citations
5.
Pinker, Steven, et al.. (1979). The how, what, and why of mental imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2(4). 570–581. 23 indexed citations
6.
Shwartz, Steven P.. (1978). Tachistoscope simulation package. Behavior Research Methods. 10(6). 773–778. 4 indexed citations
7.
Green, Bert F. & Steven P. Shwartz. (1978). Comparative evaluation of computer-based tachistoscopes. Behavior Research Methods. 10(6). 789–795. 6 indexed citations
8.
Green, Bert F. & Steven P. Shwartz. (1978). Introduction. Behavior Research Methods. 10(6). 754–755. 2 indexed citations
9.
Shwartz, Steven P., James R. Pomerantz, & Howard E. Egeth. (1977). State and process limitations in information processing: An additive factors analysis.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 3(3). 402–410. 8 indexed citations
10.
Shwartz, Steven P., James R. Pomerantz, & Howard E. Egeth. (1977). State and process limitations in information processing: An additive factors analysis.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 3(3). 402–410. 52 indexed citations
11.
Kosslyn, Stephen M. & Steven P. Shwartz. (1977). A Simulation of Visual Imagery*. Cognitive Science. 1(3). 265–295. 155 indexed citations
12.
Shwartz, Steven P.. (1976). Capacity limitations in human information processing. Memory & Cognition. 4(6). 763–768. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026