Steven M. Specht

494 total citations
10 papers, 381 citations indexed

About

Steven M. Specht is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Steven M. Specht has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 381 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 3 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Steven M. Specht's work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Mast cells and histamine (2 papers) and Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (2 papers). Steven M. Specht is often cited by papers focused on Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Mast cells and histamine (2 papers) and Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (2 papers). Steven M. Specht collaborates with scholars based in United States. Steven M. Specht's co-authors include Linda P. Spear, Cheryl L. Kirstein, Cynthia M. Kuhn, Louis D. Matzel, Yu R. Han, Meghana Karnik, Nicholas J. Scott, Chetan C. Gandhi, Henya C. Grossman and Rena Li and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Progress in Neurobiology and Physiology & Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Steven M. Specht

10 papers receiving 371 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Steven M. Specht United States	8	139	122	119	57	55	10	381
R.M. Colwill United States	5	177 1.3×	159 1.3×	77 0.6×	29 0.5×	50 0.9×	5	420
J.A. Devenport United States	13	176 1.3×	145 1.2×	82 0.7×	71 1.2×	106 1.9×	19	504
K. Troy Harker Canada	7	318 2.3×	242 2.0×	77 0.6×	49 0.9×	28 0.5×	8	538
Evelyn F. Field Canada	14	126 0.9×	81 0.7×	338 2.8×	224 3.9×	53 1.0×	21	574
Margaret L. Forgie Canada	14	143 1.0×	184 1.5×	297 2.5×	205 3.6×	23 0.4×	17	542
Nicholas S. Waters United States	14	326 2.3×	107 0.9×	86 0.7×	52 0.9×	18 0.3×	18	565
Philipp J. Kraemer United States	12	295 2.1×	115 0.9×	84 0.7×	48 0.8×	59 1.1×	21	476
A.A. Nunez United States	15	147 1.1×	168 1.4×	121 1.0×	38 0.7×	25 0.5×	20	650
Rajnish P. Rao Germany	8	185 1.3×	101 0.8×	176 1.5×	117 2.1×	12 0.2×	12	440
De Wet Wolmarans South Africa	11	133 1.0×	168 1.4×	129 1.1×	62 1.1×	13 0.2×	40	504

Countries citing papers authored by Steven M. Specht

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven M. Specht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven M. Specht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven M. Specht more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven M. Specht

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven M. Specht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven M. Specht. The network helps show where Steven M. Specht may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven M. Specht

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven M. Specht. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven M. Specht based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven M. Specht. Steven M. Specht is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Specht, Steven M., et al.. (2016). Nostalgia and Perceptions of Artwork. Psychological Reports. 118(1). 57–69. 4 indexed citations

Specht, Steven M.. (2010). Artists' Statements Can Influence Perceptions of Artwork. Empirical Studies of the Arts. 28(2). 193–206. 21 indexed citations

Specht, Steven M.. (2007). Successive Contrast Effects for Judgments of Abstraction in Artwork following Minimal Pre-Exposure. Empirical Studies of the Arts. 25(1). 63–70. 13 indexed citations

Matzel, Louis D., Yu R. Han, Henya C. Grossman, et al.. (2003). Individual Differences in the Expression of a “General” Learning Ability in Mice. Journal of Neuroscience. 23(16). 6423–6433. 160 indexed citations

Specht, Steven M. & Robert C. Twining. (1999). Human Taste Contrast and Self-Reported Measures of Anxiety. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 88(2). 384–386. 7 indexed citations

Shen, Yong, et al.. (1994). The hippocampus: A biological model for studying learning and memory. Progress in Neurobiology. 44(5). 485–496. 56 indexed citations

Specht, Steven M., et al.. (1990). Injection of 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine into the B3 raphe region of neonatal rat pups induces hyperalgesia but only slight alterations in ingestion-related behaviors. Behavioral and Neural Biology. 53(2). 244–257. 2 indexed citations

Spear, Linda P., Steven M. Specht, Cheryl L. Kirstein, & Cynthia M. Kuhn. (1989). Anterior and posterior, but not cheek, intraoral canulation procedures elevate serum corticosterone levels in neonatal rat pups. Developmental Psychobiology. 22(4). 401–411. 91 indexed citations

Specht, Steven M. & Linda P. Spear. (1989). Histamine-elicted drinking in weanling and adult rats. Physiology & Behavior. 45(1). 63–70. 10 indexed citations

10.

Kraly, F. Scott & Steven M. Specht. (1984). Histamine plays a major role for drinking elicited by spontaneous eating in rats. Physiology & Behavior. 33(4). 611–614. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact