Steven L. Liebling
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 1%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 2%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Geophysics top 10%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Carlos PalenzuelaLuis LehnerDavid NeilsenMatthew AndersonAlex BuchelPatrick M. MotlEric HirschmannMatthew W. Choptuik
- Topics
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (37 papers)Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (28 papers)Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (22 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSpain
In The Last Decade
Steven L. Liebling
56 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 2.4k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.2k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 243
- Geophysics 175
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 166
Countries citing papers authored by Steven L. Liebling
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven L. Liebling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven L. Liebling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven L. Liebling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steven L. Liebling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven L. Liebling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven L. Liebling. The network helps show where Steven L. Liebling may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven L. Liebling
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven L. Liebling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven L. Liebling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven L. Liebling. Steven L. Liebling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 58 | |
| 8 | 194 | |
| 9 | Holographic Thermalization, Stability of AdS, and the FPU Paradox | 8 |
| 10 | 87 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 71 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Fully Relativistic Simulations of the Inspiral and Merger of Black Hole - Neutron Star Binaries | 1 |
| 15 | 69 | |
| 16 | 53 | |
| 17 | 125 | |
| 18 | 101 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 30 |
About Steven L. Liebling
Steven L. Liebling is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Numerical Analysis, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (37 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (28 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (2.4k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.2k citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (166 citations). Steven L. Liebling has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Carlos Palenzuela, Luis Lehner, David Neilsen, Matthew Anderson, Alex Buchel, Patrick M. Motl, Eric Hirschmann, Matthew W. Choptuik, Stephen Green and Evan O’Connor. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Physical Review Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.