David Neilsen
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Geophysics top 10%
- Computational Mechanics top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- Luis LehnerSteven L. LieblingMatthew AndersonCarlos PalenzuelaPatrick M. MotlEric HirschmannMatthew W. ChoptuikEvan O’Connor
- Topics
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (27 papers)Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (18 papers)Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (11 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPhysical Review LettersSIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
David Neilsen
32 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.1k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 429
- Geophysics 108
- Computational Mechanics 64
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 59
Countries citing papers authored by David Neilsen
This map shows the geographic impact of David Neilsen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Neilsen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Neilsen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Neilsen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Neilsen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Neilsen. The network helps show where David Neilsen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Neilsen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Neilsen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Neilsen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Neilsen. David Neilsen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 132 | |
| 5 | 38 | |
| 6 | 89 | |
| 7 | Fully Relativistic Simulations of the Inspiral and Merger of Black Hole - Neutron Star Binaries | 1 |
| 8 | 69 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 53 | |
| 12 | 125 | |
| 13 | 89 | |
| 14 | Relativistic MHD and black hole excision: Formulation and initial tests | 1 |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 56 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About David Neilsen
David Neilsen is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Numerical Analysis, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (27 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (18 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.1k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (429 citations) and Geophysics (108 citations). David Neilsen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Luis Lehner, Steven L. Liebling, Matthew Anderson, Carlos Palenzuela, Patrick M. Motl, Eric Hirschmann, Matthew W. Choptuik, Evan O’Connor, Joel E. Tohline and Óscar Caballero. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Physical Review Letters and SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.